Skip to main content

Development of environmental loop-mediated isothermal amplification (eLAMP) diagnostic tool for Bulinus truncatus field detection



Global changes are reshaping the distribution of vector-borne diseases by spreading vectors to previously non-endemic areas. Since 2013, urogenital schistosomiasis has emerged in Corsica and threatens European countries. Gastropod vectors release schistosome larvae that can infect humans who come into contact with freshwater bodies. Monitoring schistosomiasis host vectors is a prerequisite to understand and subsequently to control this pathogen transmission. Because malacological surveys are time consuming and require special expertise, the use of a simple molecular method is desirable.


The aim of this study is to develop a ready-to-use protocol using the LAMP (loop-mediated isothermal amplification) method to detect environmental DNA of Bulinus truncatus, vector of Schistosoma haematobium. Interestingly, LAMP method possesses all the characteristics required for adaptability to field conditions particularly in low-income countries: speed, simplicity, lyophilized reagents, low cost and robustness against DNA amplification inhibitors. We have tested this new method on Corsican water samples previously analysed by qPCR and ddPCR.


We demonstrate that our diagnostic tool B. truncatus eLAMP (Bt-eLAMP) can detect the eDNA of Bulinus truncatus as effectively as the two other methods. Bt-eLAMP can even detect 1/4 of positive samples not detectable by qPCR. Moreover, the complete Bt-eLAMP protocol (sampling, sample pre-process, amplification and revelation) does not require sophisticated equipment and can be done in 1 ½ h.


LAMP detection of environmental DNA provides large-scale sensitive surveillance of urogenital schistosomiasis possible by identifying potentially threatened areas. More generally, eLAMP method has great potential in vector-borne diseases and ecology.

Graphical Abstract


It is well established that global changes increase the risk of infectious disease outbreaks [1,2,3]. The successive epidemic waves over the past decade such as the swine flu pandemic, numerous Ebola virus outbreaks in West Africa, 2015 Zika virus outbreak and the COVID-19 pandemic all resulted in significant mortality and morbidity while spreading to multiple countries [2]. The incidences of vector-borne diseases in humans and animals are impacted by climate change and human lifestyle (e.g. migration, pollution, urbanization) [1, 4, 5]. For several years, many of them have been emerging or re-emerging worldwide. For example, the geographical range of tick-borne encephalitis virus and the human incidence are increasing throughout Europe, including France, in areas that were previously non-endemic [6]. Although schistosomiasis is a disease linked to poverty and lack of potable water in households, schistosome infection has been identified in southern Europe (France and Spain) [7, 8]. Gastropod vectors release schistosome larvae that can infect humans who come into contact with freshwater bodies. In summer 2013, > 106 cases were diagnosed in Corsica, a French Mediterranean island known for its touristic attractiveness [9, 10]. Since then, a few cases of autochthonous transmission have persisted year after year [11]. For many parasitic diseases, global changes lead to a spatial redistribution of the vectors or the intermediate hosts which transmit the diseases and may also lead to disease emergence [12,13,14,15,16]. Mapping infectious disease outbreak areas is essential to both identify populations at risk of infection and communicate and warn the public [17]. Concerning vector-borne diseases, since the transmission is dependent on the presence of the vectors, mapping their spatial distributions is necessary for disease control. It has been shown in several African countries that snail control campaigns play a major role in controlling snail-borne diseases (SBDs) and that regular application of molluscicides probably contributes to the elimination of the SBDs in at-risk areas [18,19,20]. However, the monitoring of SBDs, particularly those transmitted via freshwater snail species, is less obvious. The spatial and temporal heterogeneity of the distribution of freshwater molluscs explains the difficulty of establishing these risk maps [21, 22]. Conventional sampling methods are therefore laborious and time-consuming, and they require malacologists for taxonomic identification, which have become increasingly scarce in recent years as molecular biology has taken off. Therefore, it is currently very difficult to monitor snail populations on a large spatial and temporal scale [21, 22].

The development of tools to simplify the monitoring of SBDs has been considered to address this issue, based on environmental DNA (eDNA) [23]. eDNA amplification methods were developed to detect many parasite vectors such as Aedes albopictus [24] and also snail hosts such as Galba truncatula and Austropeplea tomentosa [25, 26], both species being involved in the transmission of the liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica). The detection of eDNA is usually done using quantitative PCR DNA amplification technique. More recently, the eDNA detection of Oncomelania hupensis and Bulinus truncatus, involved in the transmission of Schistosoma japonicum and Schistosoma haematobium, respectively, has been made possible by either quantitative PCR (qPCR) or digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) [21, 27]. The results obtained in these last studies showed high-sensitivity and -specificity detection. Detection of B. truncatus eDNA by ddPCR allowed finding up to 0.06 copies/µl [21]. This represents a significant advance in the development of tools to simplify SBD monitoring. However, all these techniques require sophisticated and expensive equipment for both sample preparation (i.e. the use of expensive and time-consuming DNA extraction kits to obtain eDNA without PCR inhibitors) and amplification equipment (i.e. LightCycler or ddPCR). These costly techniques require a well equipped laboratory, which is rarely available in schistosome-endemic areas. Development of cost-effective and field-adapted tools for realization of snail distribution maps is still needed [17, 23, 28]. The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technique has the potential to make this possible [29,30,31]. Interestingly, the LAMP method possesses all the characteristics required for adaptability to field conditions particularly in low-income countries: speed, simplicity, lyophilized reagents, low cost and robustness against DNA amplification inhibitors [29, 30, 32]. Indeed, using a Bst polymerase enzyme with strand displacement activity and four to six primers hybridizing on six to eight regions of the target sequence, the exponential DNA amplification reaction can be performed at constant temperature, without prior denaturation of the DNA double strands. Indeed, the hybridization of the primers will create stem-loop structures on the newly amplified strands leading to the exponential multiplication of the number of new amplification start zones. We finally obtain a smear composed of several fragments of varied sizes which form a ladder after revelation by electrophoresis gel. Thus, the reaction is performed very quickly (usually < 1 h) at a constant temperature of around 63 °C in a simple heating block [29, 31, 33]. Since no large or expensive equipment is required to perform a LAMP, recent studies have focused on the development of portable devices to perform field diagnosis as close as possible to the sampling site [34,35,36,37]. Due to its robustness against inhibitors, it can be performed on samples with very simplified preparation, without the need for DNA extraction kits to purify the DNA, which can also be done in the field [38, 39]. DNA amplification can be detected by naked-eye visualization, gel electrophoresis or real-time fluorescence, offering flexibility of use in field settings [34, 36]. Recent studies have shown that it is possible to detect eDNA by LAMP [40,41,42,43]. An environmental LAMP (eLAMP) was developed to detect the presence of faecal indicator bacteria in water in 1 h, without sophisticated laboratory equipment or highly trained personnel [40]. Two teams succeeded in amplifying mollusc eDNA (Galba truncatula and Dreissena sp.) from water samples with LAMP [41, 42].

The aim of this study is to develop a rapid diagnostic LAMP tool to detect the environmental DNA of Bulinus truncatus, intermediate host of Schistosoma haematobium. Schistosomiasis is the second most common parasitic disease after malaria and remains a neglected tropical disease. Despite its high incidence (230 million infected people and 200,000 deaths per year [44]), efforts to conduct snail control campaigns are very low [28, 45, 46]. However, in 2017, WHO called for refocusing on snail control to sustain progress, calling on member states to develop or adapt national vector control strategies, aiming to reduce the incidence of vector-borne diseases, including schistosomiasis, by at least 40% by 2025 [46]. Thus, cost-effective, field-appropriate tools for rapid mapping of snail distribution are needed for this disease [23]. Compared to qPCR or ddPCR amplification methods, the eLAMP seems advantageous for field applicability in low-income countries. However, this advantage disappears if the DNA extraction protocol that precedes amplification is not adapted to field conditions like using DNA extraction kits. Our work consisted in (i) development of B. truncatus-specific eLAMP assay, (ii) comparison of the results obtained by LAMP on an eDNA bank with those obtained by qPCR and ddPCR and (iii) development of a full field-friendly protocol of detection.



The Bulinus truncatus eLAMP (Bt-eLAMP) diagnostic tool was developed from both an environmental DNA (eDNA) bank and newly extracted DNA from molluscs.

The eDNA bank is composed of 200 samples previously collected on Corsica island, France [21]. These samples were DNA extracted from water filtration membranes collected in two distinct rivers from southern Corsica. Urogenital schistosomiasis transmission has recently been evidenced in these two rivers [9, 10, 47]. Three different volumes of water (1, 3 and 5 l) from both the shore and the streambeds of the rivers were collected. Four sites were sampled in the Cavu River: the Mulinu bridge and Tyroliana park sites (sampled in duplicate), the three pools site where B. truncatus are present and the water intake site where B. truncatus are absent. A single site was sampled from the Solenzara River where B. truncatus are present. Negative controls were made by filtering pure spring water along the river. In addition to these sampling sites in Corsica, eDNA was also sampled from an artificial channel within the campus of Perpignan University, where B. truncatus has never been recorded, as a negative control. The eDNA extraction protocol from the resulting water filtration membranes was previously described [21] and is briefly recalled here: each filtration membrane was divided into four quarters and extracted using DNeasy® Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN). From the 200 samples, 144 eDNA samples were collected where B. truncatus were present and 56 eDNA samples collected where B. truncatus were not present, and they were amplified using qPCR. A sample was considered positive if at least one quarter membrane was positive. The ddPCR reactions were run on pools of DNA extracts from the four quarters of each membrane (i.e. 50 reactions) [21]. Results per membrane obtained with both qPCR and ddPCR were compared to eLAMP (present study). Results per membrane quarter obtained by qPCR were also compared to eLAMP.

In addition to eDNAs, and to test the specificity of our primer sets, DNA from freshwater snails (Bulinus sp. and other phylogenetically related genera) was also extracted using the DNeasy® Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN) following the tissue extraction protocol. Briefly, after grinding each snail, the samples were put in a Speedvac™ DNA 130 (Savant™, Thermo Scientific™) at 65 °C for 20 min to remove any alcohol or water residuals. The snails were then lysed at 56 °C for 4 h in a solution containing 20 ml proteinase K and 180 ml ATL buffer. The remaining steps were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA concentration was measured using a Qubit® 2.0 fluorometer. These last DNAs were diluted with ultrapure water to obtain final concentrations of 0.5 ng/µl. The resulting DNA extracts and dilutions were then stored at -20 °C until used.

eLAMP primer set design

The DNA target selection was exhaustive to maximize the chance of success in the development of the eLAMP diagnostic tool. The ITS2; 5,8S; 18S; COI; and 28S B. truncatus DNA regions were downloaded from GenBank database (NCBI,; accession numbers: MH361757 for 5,8S; KJ157340 for 18S [48]; KJ157370 for 28S [48]; MT707426 for COI [49] and MG757890 for ITS2 [50]). When available, sequences from other Bulinus species were downloaded from GenBank database to develop a B. truncatus-specific detection tool. The design of primer sets was carried out using Primer Explorer V5 software (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Japan; following the criteria described in "A Guide to LAMP primer designing" ( The sets had to meet the following parameters: length of each primer between 18 and 22 bp; Tm between 64 and 67 °C for F1c/B1c pair; Tm between 59 and 62 °C for F2/B2 and F3/B3 pairs; GC rate between 50 and 65%; dG threshold < –4 kcal/mol for 5’ and 3’ stability and between 0 and –1 kcal/mol for dimer check. Primer dimer estimation and stability of each primer set were checked online using the "Multiple Primer Analyzer" (Thermo Scientific Web Tool) and OligoAnalyzer™ Tool (IDT™). All the primers selected were synthesized by Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium).

LAMP reaction

For each designed primer set several amplification assays were performed by adjusting the amplification reaction parameters (i.e. MgSO4, primers and betaine concentration, reaction time and temperature). The selected protocol was as follows: a total volume of 10 µl containing 1.2 µM of the internal primers FIP and BIP, 0.2 μM of the external primers F3 and B3, 0.4 µM of the LOOP primers LB and LF, 1.0 mM of each dNTP (New England Biolabs), 1X Isothermal Amplification Buffer II reaction buffer [20 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 150 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, 0. 1% Tween® 20, pH 8.8@25 °C (New England Biolabs, UK)], 3 mM additional MgSO4 (New England Biolabs, UK), 1.2 M betaine and 1 U of Bst 2.0 WarmStart DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, UK) along with 2.5 µl DNA template. Reaction tubes were placed in a battery-operated heating block at 63 ̊C for 45 min followed by an enzyme inactivation phase at 80 °C for 5 min if the results were not visualised immediately after the reaction. Result visualisations were done according to different protocols classically used in LAMP DNA amplification: (i) final point visual detection of fluorescence after adding 2 μl of 1:50 diluted 10,000× concentration of SYBR Green (Invitrogen) (green: positive; orange: negative); (ii) final point visual detection of the LAMP products on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis with 2 µl MIDORI Green Advance (Nippon Genetics) for 50 ml agarose gel, revealed by UVs; (iii) real-time detection by incorporating Sybr-Green 0.25× in the reaction mix and monitoring the amplification in a Genie III portable device (Optigene Ltd).

Specificity and limit of detection

The specificity of all designed primer sets was assessed on DNA templates from 12 freshwater snail species (Table 1), including four specimens of the same genus but different species (i.e. B. forskalii, B. globosus, B. umbilicatus and B. senegalensis) and other phylogenetically related genera. Bulinus truncatus from five different localities (Table 1) were evaluated to visualise a possible intraspecific variability. Only the primer set amplifying exclusively B. truncatus DNA was kept for the ensuing experiments.

Table 1 Snail species used for assessing the specificity of the developed Bulinus truncatus LAMP primer sets

The limit of detection (LOD) was assessed by LAMP assays on DNA from B. truncatus tenfold serially diluted from 10 ng/µl to 1.10–9 ng/µl before and after adding LOOP primers to the reaction. From the detection limit DNA concentration obtained, the number of B. truncatus target copies per microlitre was estimated using the following equation:

$${N}_{c}=\frac{\mathrm{C}\times \mathrm{V}\times {1.10}^{-9}}{\mathrm{M}\times {S}_{g}\times 2}{ \times N}_{A}\times {N}_{rDNA}$$

where Nc = the number of B. truncatus target copies per microlitre; C = limit detection DNA concentration in ng/µl; V = volume (here, 1 µl); M = average molar mass of a nitrogenous base = 309 g/mol; Sg = B. truncatus genome size = 1.2.109 pb; NA = Avogadro number; NrDNA = average rDNA copy number in a genome = 93 copies [51,52,53,54,55,56].

Field applicability

We have developed a new field-friendly eDNA concentration protocol allowing us to take full advantage of the field benefits of LAMP. The water is collected in a clean plastic commercial bottle on the surface of the water body. Then, 500 ml to 1500 ml of water is filtered along the river using a 0.45 µm filtration unit (PES VWR 1L 514-0301) and a manual pump. The water is filtered until the membrane is blocked because of sediment stacking. The membrane is cut in four quarters with a scalpel blade and deposited in a single 25-ml Falcon™ tube containing 15 ml lysis buffer [100 mM NaCl, 250 mM EDTA, 5% SDS and 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH = 8)]. Clamps used to remove the membranes from filtration units are decontaminated before each sampling by successively placing them in a 10% bleach bath for 15 s and then 15 s in a DNA AWAY™ solution (Thermo Scientific). After vigorous agitation, the liquid is collected with a 20-ml syringe. The liquid is pre-filtered with a 40-µm membrane to remove the larger sediments and then filtered with a 0.45-µm (13-mm) Whatman® GD/XP syringe filter (PTFE Sigma Aldrich WHA69742504). The last filter is washed with 5 ml distilled water and dried with the same volume of air. The eDNA is finally recovered by reverse filtration with 500 µl ultrapure water thanks to a syringe coupled with a conical 18 GA dispensing needle (Metcal).

This last protocol was assessed in two Senegalese water bodies investigated in July 2022. The Lampsar site (16°06′29′′N; 16°20′59′′W) and Diama site (16°12′36′′N; 16°24′10′′W) are both situated along the Senegal River in Saint-Louis region, Senegal. At each site, water samples were collected in triplicate with about 10 m between samplings. Seven hundred millilitres, two times 500 ml and three times 500 ml were collected for Lampsar and Diama sites, respectively. At each site negative controls were carried out by filtering 1500 ml pure spring water strictly following the same procedure as for biological samples. The presence on site of B. truncatus was verified by sampling molluscs for 1 h by two malacologists.

Statistical analysis

The agreement between results obtained with the newly developed LAMP and the qPCR for the detection of B. truncatus DNA on the 200 field eDNA library were statistically analysed calculating a kappa coefficient analysis using psych package (version 2.2.9) in R software. Field sensitivities on the eDNA bank were calculated with a 95% confidence interval using stats package (version 3.6.2) in R software.


Specificity and limit of detection of selected LAMP primer sets

A total of 18 primer sets were designed. After parameter adjustment and sensitivity and specificity assessment, we have selected the best candidate which targets the ITS2” marker (Table 2). An additional file shows the primer alignment on the ITS2 sequence (see Additional file 1). Primer dimer minimum dG for this set was –0.93 kcal/mol.

Table 2 Primer sequences designed for Bulinus truncatus eLAMP assays

Bt-eLAMP specificity was assessed by testing extracted DNA from 11 non-targeted species and five targeted molluscs from different localities. Figure 1a shows that only the five B. truncatus DNA samples are amplified. Sensitivity test (Fig. 1b) shows that the LOD is 1 fg/µl (i.e. equivalent to about Nc = 0.07 copies per microlitre) with complete primer set (including LOOP primers). The detection limit was 1 pg/µl before adding the LOOP primers.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Specificity and LOD (limit of detection) of the Bulinus truncatus eLAMP (Bt-eLAMP) assay. Results obtained with agarose gel electrophoresis after 45 min of reaction. a Specificity; lanes 1–5, Bulinus truncatus DNA templates from five different localities (Diama, Lampsar, Mbane, Corsica and Saneinte); lane 6, Bulinus globosus; lane 7, Bulinus senegalensis; lane 8, Bulinus forskalli; lane 9, Bulinus umbilicatus; lane 10, Biomphalaria glabrata; lane 11, Bithynia tentaculata; lane 12, Ancylus fluviatilis; lane 13, Gyraulus laevis; lane 14, Physa acuta; lane 15, Potamopyrgus antipodarum; lane 16, Pisidium casertanum; lane C + , positive control (Bulinus truncatus DNA; 1 ng); lane C-, negative control (water as template). b LOD; lane 1–11, Bulinus truncatus DNA tenfold serial dilutions (10 ng/μL to 1 ag/μl); lane C-, negative control (water as template)

Comparison of LAMP to qPCR and ddPCR amplification methods on eDNA samples

Figure 2 shows detection accuracy comparison among LAMP, qPCR and ddPCR amplification methods on eDNA samples collected from two Corsican rivers. The Bt-eLAMP method provided the same results as those obtained using the qPCR and ddPCR. All membranes are positive except for the "1LStreambed" membrane from the Mulinu bridge two site. No positive signal was detected from the six field negative controls or from the University site where B. truncatus never occurred or for samples collected at Water intake site from the Cavu River where no B. truncatus were collected (Fig. 2). Considering results obtained per membrane quarter where B. truncatus was present, 110 of 144 samples were successfully amplified with LAMP; meanwhile, 91 of 144 samples were successfully amplified with qPCR. The sensitivities of LAMP and qPCR methods were estimated to be 76.4% (95% CI 68.6–83.1) and 63.2% (95% CI 54.8–71.1), respectively. Kappa agreement obtained with these results is equal to 0.51 (Table 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of Bulinus truncatus environmental DNA detection by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) amplification methods. Each cell represents DNA amplification results from eDNA collected in two Corsican rivers (Cavu and Solenzara) and Perpignan Channel; Bulinus truncatus snails are present in all sites except the water intake site in the Cavu River and university site in the Perpignan Channel. Three volumes of water (1, 3 and 5 l) from both the shore and the streambeds of the rivers were collected in all Corsican sites. Each line represents the amplification result from each site using LAMP, qPCR or ddPCR amplification method. qPCR and ddPCR results come from Mulero et al. [21]. A green membrane means that at least one quarter of the filtration membrane is positive for Bulinus truncatus presence and red membrane means that no quarter of the filtration membrane is positive. Empty cells mean that no filtration was done under these conditions

Table 3 Cross table comparing LAMP and qPCR analyses of Bulinus truncatus eDNA with kappa agreement

Field applicability

The use of LAMP amplification as field-friendly detection method was improved by developing a new eDNA concentration protocol that could be done along the water bodies. The entire protocol was tested on Lampsar and Diama sites, Senegal. In these two sites, respectively, 95 and 229 B. truncatus were sampled by two malacologists for 1 h sampling. Four of the 95 B. truncatus sampled from Lampsar site emitted cercariae after 2 h light exposure. Bulinus globosus was present at both sites. Bulinus forskalii was only present at Diama site, while we found Biomphalaria pfeifferi only at Lampsar site. The three eDNA samplings from the two sites were positive (Fig. 3) showing 100% accuracy of the method. None of the negative controls were positive. Samples of B. truncatus eDNA were amplified on average 12 min after amplification of the positive controls (B. truncatus extracted DNA).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification of Bulinus truncatus environmental DNA in Diama (a) and Lampsar (b) sites, Senegal. Orange, yellow and green lines are tested samples. Turquoise and blue lines are positive controls (1 ng of B. truncatus extracted DNA). Red line is field negative sample (1500 ml filtration of mineral water). Violet and pink lines are laboratory negative samples (ultrapure water)


Global changes are reshaping the distribution of vector-borne diseases by spreading vectors to previously non-endemic areas. Therefore, the development of cost-effective and field-adapted tools for vector distribution maps is necessary [17, 28]. In the present study, we have developed a rapid LAMP diagnostic tool to detect the environmental DNA of a freshwater snail vector (i.e. B. truncatus) of a tropical parasite (i.e. S. haematobium). Our Bt-eLAMP successfully amplified an ITS2 DNA marker fraction of B. truncatus after 45 min of incubation at 63 °C. In vitro assays evidenced the high sensitivity of the Bt-eLAMP with a LOD equal to 1 fg/µl when it included LOOP primers. Considering that the LOD was 1 pg/µl before adding the LOOP primers, we deduce that the addition of LOOP primers allows a gain in sensitivity of a factor of 1000. From a methodological point of view, this highlights the importance of designing primer sets allowing inclusion of LOOP primers. The detection limits of the developed LAMP techniques are generally between 100–0.1 fg/µl [43, 57,58,59]. Our LOD is lower compared to the LOD previously evaluated for the LAMP eDNA detection of the freshwater snail vector of fasciolosis (Galba truncatula) [41]. These last authors measured a 0.349 pg/μl LOD [41]. When estimating the copy number equivalence (0.07 copies per microlitre) with the complete primer set (i.e. including LOOP primers), we found a sensitivity close to that obtained using ddPCR (0.06 copies per microlitre) [21]. Our Bt-eLAMP showed equal sensitivity compared to the ddPCR, which is considered the most sensitive DNA amplification technique of all [60, 61].

Our Bt-eLAMP assay showed 100% specificity for B. truncatus even considering closely related snail species. This suggests that the Bt-eLAMP assay is robust enough to detect B. truncatus eDNA in areas where other snails co-occur without risk of cross-reactivity. Our tool can also allow species determination between B. truncatus and other Bulinus species such as B. globosus, which are morphologically indistinguishable. On the other hand, the usefulness of this high specificity could be questioned if we consider that some molluscs’ sister species, such as B. globosus, could also be involved in the transmission of urogenital schistosomiasis [62]. It would be interesting to also develop eDNA diagnostic tools allowing a pan-specific detection of both B. truncatus and B. globosus or all species of the Bulinus genus. The difficulty will be to find an equilibrium between sufficiently conserved regions between Bulinus species and sufficiently different from other gastropods to obtain a genus-specific primer set. This last task is more difficult as the number of primers required in LAMP and the positioning constraints between them on the target sequence increase the length of the sequence to be found meeting these requirements.

Considering our eDNA bank, the Bt-eLAMP method provided exactly the same overall detection capacity compared to the qPCR or the ddPCR [21]. Considering each membrane quarter, with 76.4% (95% CI 68.6–83.1) and 63.2% (95% CI 54.8–71.1) of positive detection using LAMP or qPCR, respectively, the LAMP method showed higher detection capacity compared to qPCR [21]. The kappa coefficient highlights moderate agreement between the two methods. Fifteen membrane quarters are negative in LAMP while they are positive in qPCR; conversely, 34 membrane quarters are negative in qPCR and positive in LAMP. The presence of PCR inhibitors could explain these last results. Indeed, it has already been proven that, in contrast to qPCR, LAMP is robust against inhibitors [29, 63].

Development of field friendly amplification methods such as LAMP need to be accompanied by the development of a field-friendly pre-process of the sample. Use of DNA extraction kits that have a low yield due to their high purification level requires special apparatuses such as centrifuges, which are costly. Therefore, we have developed a new field-friendly water sample pre-process to concentrate the eDNA. The sampling and pre-process protocol were done in 45 min in the field without electricity, which represents a significant advance in SBDs monitoring. Nevertheless, several improvements can be made to our protocol, especially on the water filtration step. The manual pump used limits the speed and convenience of the protocol since it took 30 min per sample to filter just 500 ml of water with difficulties. A 12-V battery-powered diaphragm water pump coupled with an adapted filter capsule was used to filter up to 50 l water in a DNA survey targeting trematodes in water [64]. To further enhance the practicability and speed of the Bt-eLAMP assay, an improved battery-operated pump could replace the manual pump. The compatibility between a motorised pump and the filter units used in our protocol needs to be tested.

We used the Genie III to obtain our field results from Senegal, which is a useful, easily transportable, battery-operated field tool, allowing visualization of reaction kinetics. Coupled with freeze-dried reagents, this type of portable device makes it possible to carry out the entire protocol (sampling, pre-process, amplification and revelation) in the field [32]. We should use another portable device for low-income countries where the use of the Genie III may be a financial obstacle. The COVID-19 global pandemic involved the development of several tools to perform low-cost and field-friendly LAMPs [34, 35, 65,66,67]. A low-cost and open-source LAMP diagnostic device has been developed that allows real-time amplification and fluorescence reading in the same way as the Genie III [34]. It has even been proven that the LAMP reaction can be done using a coffee capsule filled with phase change material, called a “T-cup”, allowing incubation at 63 °C in boiling water and a naked-eye revelation [35]. In another study, the revelation step of a smartphone-based LAMP could be assessed with a smartphone application coupled with filters allowing the fluorescence reading. In the future, the current LAMP test should be improved with freeze-dried reagents and this type of device and then tested on a large sampling.


In this study, we developed a full field-friendly LAMP assay detecting the presence of the trematode intermediate snail host B. truncatus DNA in the environment. Due to LAMP's advantages of being field-friendly and allowing cost-effective pre-process samples, Bt-eLAMP test may be a valuable new tool for quickly and efficiently establishing recurrent risk maps for urogenital schistosomiasis. eLAMP has also been used to detect the presence of intestinal parasites in wastewater during treatment, even offering the possibility of looking for Schistosoma sp. eDNA directly [68]. It would be necessary to develop eLAMP for other Bulinus or Biomphalaria species responsible for the transmission of Schistosoma. eLAMP could also be developed for other SBDs that have the same diagnostic pressures as schistosomiasis.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.



Snail-borne disease


Loop-mediated isothermal amplification


Environmental loop-mediated isothermal amplification


Polymerase chain reaction


Quantitative polymerase chain reaction


Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction


Environmental DNA


Limit of detection


Positive control


Negative control


  1. Nii-Trebi NI. Emerging and neglected infectious diseases: insights, advances, and challenges. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5245021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker RE, Mahmud AS, Miller IF, Rajeev M, Rasambainarivo F, Rice BL, et al. Infectious disease in an era of global change. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022;20:193–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tredennick AT, O’Dea EB, Ferrari MJ, Park AW, Rohani P, Drake JM. Anticipating infectious disease re-emergence and elimination: a test of early warning signals using empirically based models. J R Soc Interface. 2022;19:20220123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Caminade C, McIntyre KM, Jones AE. Impact of recent and future climate change on vector-borne diseases. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2019;1436:157–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Allen T, Murray KA, Zambrana-Torrelio C, Morse SS, Rondinini C, Di Marco M, et al. Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez G, Bournez L, Moraes RA, Marine D, Galon C, Vorimore F, et al. A one-health approach to investigating an outbreak of alimentary tick-borne encephalitis in a non-endemic area in France (Ain, Eastern France): a longitudinal serological study in livestock, detection in ticks, and the first tick-borne encephalitis virus isolation and molecular characterisation. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:863725.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Salas-Coronas J, Bargues MD, Lozano-Serrano AB, Artigas P, Martínez-Ortí A, Mas-Coma S, et al. Evidence of autochthonous transmission of urinary schistosomiasis in Almeria (southeast Spain): an outbreak analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2021;44:102165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boissier J, Moné H, Mitta G, Bargues MD, Molyneux D, Mas-Coma S. Schistosomiasis reaches Europe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:757–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boissier J, Grech-Angelini S, Webster BL, Allienne J-F, Huyse T, Mas-Coma S, et al. Outbreak of urogenital schistosomiasis in Corsica (France): an epidemiological case study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:971–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noël H, Ruello M, Maccary A, Pelat C, Sommen C, Boissier J, et al. Large outbreak of urogenital schistosomiasis acquired in Southern Corsica, France: monitoring early signs of endemicization? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berry A, Fillaux J, Martin-Blondel G, Boissier J, Iriart X, Marchou B, et al. Evidence for a permanent presence of schistosomiasis in Corsica, France, 2015. Euro Surveill. 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Sayed A, Kamel M. Climatic changes and their role in emergence and re-emergence of diseases. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020;27:22336–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Giron S, Fournet N, Franke F, Brottet E, Calba C, Cochet A, et al. Review of Arbovirus surveillance in 2019: transition to surveillance for confirmed cases of Chikungunya, Dengue and Zika Virus in metropolitant France. BEH. 2019;22:446–55.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Musso D, Gubler DJ. Zika virus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29:487–524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mysterud A, Easterday WR, Stigum VM, Aas AB, Meisingset EL, Viljugrein H. Contrasting emergence of Lyme disease across ecosystems. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11882.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Millins C, Leo W, MacInnes I, Ferguson J, Charlesworth G, Nayar D, et al. Emergence of Lyme disease on Treeless Islands, Scotland, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:538–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kraemer MUG, Hay SI, Pigott DM, Smith DL, Wint GRW, Golding N. Progress and challenges in infectious disease cartography. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32:19–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rollinson D, Knopp S, Levitz S, Stothard JR, Tchuem Tchuenté L-A, Garba A, et al. Time to set the agenda for schistosomiasis elimination. Acta Trop. 2013;128:423–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. King CH, Sutherland LJ, Bertsch D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of chemical-based Mollusciciding for control of Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium transmission. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sokolow SH, Wood CL, Jones IJ, Swartz SJ, Lopez M, Hsieh MH, et al. Global assessment of schistosomiasis control over the past century shows targeting the snail intermediate host works best. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004794.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mulero S, Boissier J, Allienne J-F, Quilichini Y, Foata J, Pointier J-P, et al. Environmental DNA for detecting Bulinus truncatus: a new environmental surveillance tool for schistosomiasis emergence risk assessment. Environ DNA. 2020;2:161–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lamy T, Pointier J, Jarne P, David P. Testing metapopulation dynamics using genetic, demographic and ecological data. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:1394–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kamel B, Laidemitt MR, Lu L, Babbitt C, Weinbaum OL, Mkoji GM, et al. Detecting and identifying Schistosoma infections in snails and aquatic habitats: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15:e0009175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Schneider J, Valentini A, Dejean T, Montarsi F, Taberlet P, Glaizot O, et al. Detection of invasive mosquito vectors using environmental DNA (eDNA) from water samples. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0162493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones RA, Brophy PM, Davis CN, Davies TE, Emberson H, Rees Stevens P, et al. Detection of Galba truncatula, Fasciola hepatica and Calicophoron daubneyi environmental DNA within water sources on pasture land, a future tool for fluke control? Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rathinasamy V, Hosking C, Tran L, Kelley J, Williamson G, Swan J, et al. Development of a multiplex quantitative PCR assay for detection and quantification of DNA from Fasciola hepatica and the intermediate snail host, Austropeplea tomentosa, in water samples. Vet Parasitol. 2018;259:17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Calata FIC, Caranguian CZ, Mendoza JEM, Fornillos RJC, Tabios IKB, Fontanilla IKC, et al. Analysis of environmental DNA and edaphic factors for the detection of the snail intermediate host Oncomelania hupensis quadrasi. Pathogens. 2019;8:160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kincaid-Smith J, Rey O, Toulza E, Berry A, Boissier J. Emerging Schistosomiasis in Europe: a need to quantify the risks. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33:600–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mori Y, Nagamine K, Tomita N, Notomi T. Detection of loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction by turbidity derived from magnesium pyrophosphate formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;289:150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:E63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Notomi T, Mori Y, Tomita N, Kanda H. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): principle, features, and future prospects. J Microbiol. 2015;53:1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar S, Sharma S, Bhardwaj N, Pande V, Savargaonkar D, Anvikar AR. Advanced lyophilised loop mediated isothermal amplification (L-LAMP) based point of care technique for the detection of dengue virus. J Virol Methods. 2021;293:114168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar Y. Isothermal amplification-based methods for assessment of microbiological safety and authenticity of meat and meat products. Food Control. 2021;121:107679.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Buultjens AH, Vandelannoote K, Sharkey LK, Howden BP, Monk IR, Lee JYH, et al. Low-cost, open-source device for high-performance fluorescence detection of isothermal nucleic acid amplification reactions. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7:4982–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Velders AH, Ossendrijver M, Keijser BJF, Saggiomo V. T-cup: a cheap, rapid, and simple home device for isothermal nucleic acid amplification. Glob Chall. 2022;6:2100078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen Z, Yang T, Yang H, Li T, Nie L, Mou X, et al. A portable multi-channel turbidity system for rapid detection of pathogens by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2018;14:198–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Matute T, Nuñez I, Rivera M, Reyes J, Blázquez-Sánchez P, Arce A, et al. Homebrew reagents for low cost RT-LAMP. J Biomol Tech. 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Detemmerman L, Olivier S, Bours V, Boemer F. Innovative PCR without DNA extraction for African sickle cell disease diagnosis. Hematology. 2018;23:181–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gandasegui J, Fernandez-Soto P, Carranza-Rodriguez C, Perez-Arellano JL, Vicente B, Lopez-Aban J, et al. The rapid-heat LAMPellet method: a potential diagnostic method for human urogenital Schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee S, Khoo VSL, Medriano CAD, Lee T, Park S-Y, Bae S. Rapid and in-situ detection of fecal indicator bacteria in water using simple DNA extraction and portable loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) PCR methods. Water Res. 2019;160:371–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Davis CN, Tyson F, Cutress D, Davies E, Jones DL, Brophy PM, et al. Rapid detection of Galba truncatula in water sources on pasture-land using loop-mediated isothermal amplification for control of trematode infections. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Williams MR, Stedtfeld RD, Engle C, Salach P, Fakher U, Stedtfeld T, et al. Isothermal amplification of environmental DNA (eDNA) for direct field-based monitoring and laboratory confirmation of Dreissena sp. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0186462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Feist SM, Lance RF. Genetic detection of freshwater harmful algal blooms: a review focused on the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) in Microcystis aeruginosa and Prymnesium parvum. Harmful Algae. 2021;110:102124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. World Health Organization Expert Committee on the Control of Schistosomiasis. Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis : report of a WHO expert committee. Geneve. 2002. Accessed 19 Apr 2022.

  45. Stensgaard A-S, Vounatsou P, Sengupta ME, Utzinger J. Schistosomes, snails and climate change: current trends and future expectations. Acta Trop. 2019;190:257–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Seventieth World Health Assembly. Global vector control response: an integrated approach for the control of vector-borne diseases. Report No.: WHA70.16. Geneve. 2017. Accessed 19 Apr 2022.

  47. Berry A, Moné H, Iriart X, Mouahid G, Aboo O, Boissier J, et al. Schistosomiasis haematobium, Corsica. France Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1595–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zein-Eddine R, Djuikwo-Teukeng FF, Al-Jawhari M, Senghor B, Huyse T, Dreyfuss G. Phylogeny of seven Bulinus species originating from endemic areas in three African countries, in relation to the human blood fluke Schistosoma haematobium. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14:271.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Chibwana FD, Tumwebaze I, Mahulu A, Sands AF, Albrecht C. Assessing the diversity and distribution of potential intermediate hosts snails for urogenital schistosomiasis: Bulinus spp. (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) of Lake Victoria. Parasites Vectors. 2020;13:418.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Abe EM, Guo Y-H, Shen H, Mutsaka-Makuvaza MJ, Habib MR, Xue J-B, et al. Phylogeography of Bulinus truncatus (Audouin, 1827) (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) in selected African Countries. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018;3:127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Sochorová J, Garcia S, Gálvez F, Symonová R, Kovařík A. Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database. Chromosoma. 2018;127:141–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gregory TR, Nicol J, Tamm H, Kullman B, Kullman K, Leitch I, et al. Eukaryotic genome size database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D332–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Prokopowich CD, Gregory TR, Crease TJ. The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes. Genome. 2003;46:48–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Iwanaga T, Anzawa K, Mochizuki T. Variations in ribosomal DNA copy numbers in a genome of Trichophyton interdigitale. Mycoses. 2020;63:1133–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Malone JH. Balancing copy number in ribosomal DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:2635–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Johnson SM, Carlson EL, Pappagianis D. Determination of ribosomal DNA copy number and comparison among strains of Coccidioides. Mycopathologia. 2015;179:45–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Abbasi I, King CH, Muchiri EM, Hamburger J. Detection of Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium DNA by Loop-mediated isothermal amplification: identification of infected snails from early prepatency. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:427–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Gandasegui J, Fernandez-Soto P, Hernandez-Goenaga J, Lopez-Aban J, Vicente B, Muro A. Biompha-LAMP: a new rapid loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for detecting Schistosoma mansoni in Biomphalaria glabrata snail host. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0005225.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Caldeira RL, Jannotti-Passos LK, Jannotti-Passos LK, Dos Santos Carvalho O. Use of molecular methods for the rapid mass detection of Schistosoma mansoni (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda) in Biomphalaria spp. (Gastropoda: Planorbidae). J Trop Med. 2017;2017:8628971.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Falzone L, Musso N, Gattuso G, Bongiorno D, Palermo CI, Scalia G, et al. Sensitivity assessment of droplet digital PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Int J Mol Med. 2020;46:957–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Kojabad AA, Farzanehpour M, Galeh HEG, Dorostkar R, Jafarpour A, Bolandian M, et al. Droplet digital PCR of viral DNA/RNA, current progress, challenges, and future perspectives. J Med Virol. 2021;93:4182–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Catalano S, Léger E, Fall CB, Borlase A, Diop SD, Berger D, et al. Multihost transmission of Schistosoma mansoni in Senegal, 2015–2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:1234–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Kaneko H, Kawana T, Fukushima E, Suzutani T. Tolerance of loop-mediated isothermal amplification to a culture medium and biological substances. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2007;70:499–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Douchet P, Boissier J, Mulero S, Ferté H, Doberva M, Allienne J-F, et al. Make visible the invisible: optimized development of an environmental DNA metabarcoding tool for the characterization of trematode parasitic communities. Environ DNA. 2022;4:627–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Rezaei M, Razavi Bazaz S, Morshedi Rad D, Shimoni O, Jin D, Rawlinson W, et al. A portable RT-LAMP/CRISPR machine for rapid COVID-19 screening. Biosensors (Basel). 2021;11:369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sreejith KR, Umer M, Dirr L, Bailly B, Guillon P, von Itzstein M, et al. A portable device for LAMP based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Micromachines (Basel). 2021;12:1151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Choi G, Guan W. An ultracompact real-time fluorescence loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) analyzer. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2393:257–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Ajonina C, Buzie C, Möller J, Otterpohl R. The detection of Entamoeba histolytica and Toxoplasma gondii in wastewater. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A. 2018;81:1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Special thanks to Alassane Ndiaye who helped collect the environmental DNA samples in the field. We thank Celia Robin who worked on the project during her internship and designed the additional LOOP primers.


This study was funded by the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (PNRES 2019/1/059 Molrisk) and the Occitanie Region (Schistodiag program). This study was carried out with the support of LabEx CeMEB, an ANR "Investissements d'avenir" program (ANR-10-LABX-04-01), and within the framework of the “Laboratoires d’Excellences (LABEX)” TULIP (ANR-10LABX-41).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



JP, JB, OR and MB conceived the original idea and designed the study. MB performed the laboratory development of the Bt-eLAMP assay. JB, BS and MB carried out the field sampling. JB and BS provided malacological expertise. SM provided the eDNA bank. JB, JP and MB analysed and interpreted the data. JB and MB drafted the manuscript. BS, JB, SM, OR, JP and MB revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Manon Blin or Julien Portela.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Alignment of the Bt-eLAMP primers to the ITS2 marker (accession number: MG757890). Each arrow represents a primer. The green shades represent the direction of the primer hybridization (dark green: forward; light green: backward).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blin, M., Senghor, B., Boissier, J. et al. Development of environmental loop-mediated isothermal amplification (eLAMP) diagnostic tool for Bulinus truncatus field detection. Parasites Vectors 16, 78 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Environmental DNA
  • LAMP assay
  • Intermediate host control
  • Bulinus truncatus