Skip to main content
Download PDF

Intensity and mechanisms of deltamethrin and permethrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations in southern Benin

Parasites & Vectors volume 14, Article number: 202 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Insecticide resistance is threatening the effectiveness of efforts to control malaria vectors in Benin. This study explores the levels and mechanisms of insecticide resistance in An. gambiae s.l. to pyrethroids.

Methods

Larvae were collected from August 2017 to July 2018 in five communes in southern Benin (Adjohoun, Allada, Bohicon, Cotonou, and Porto-Novo) representing diverse ecological regions, and were reared in Benin’s insectary. Two- to five-day-old female mosquitoes from each district were exposed to multiple doses of deltamethrin and permethrin (1×, 2×, 5×, and 10×) using the WHO insecticide resistance intensity bioassay. The effect of pre-exposure to the synergist, piperonyl butoxide (PBO), was also tested at different pyrethroid doses. Molecular allele frequencies of kdr (1014F) and ace-1R (119S) insecticide resistance mutations and levels of detoxification enzymes were determined for mosquitoes sampled from each study area.

Results

An. gambiae s.l. were resistant to pyrethroid-only exposure up to 10× the diagnostic doses in all the study sites for both deltamethrin and permethrin. Mortality was significantly higher in An. gambiae s.l. pre-exposed to PBO followed by exposure to deltamethrin or permethrin compared to mosquitoes exposed to deltamethrin or permethrin only (p < 0.001). The difference in mortality between deltamethrin only and PBO plus deltamethrin was the smallest in Cotonou (16–64%) and the greatest in Bohicon (12–93%). The mortality difference between permethrin only and PBO plus permethrin was the smallest in Cotonou (44–75%) and the greatest in Bohicon (22–72%). In all the study sites, the kdr resistance allele (1014F) frequency was high (75–100%), while the ace-1 resistance allele (G119S) frequency was low (0–3%). Analysis of the metabolic enzymatic activity of An. gambiae s.l. showed overexpression of nonspecific esterases and glutathione S-transferases (GST) in all study sites. In contrast to the PBO results, oxidase expression was low and was similar to the susceptible An. gambiae s.s. Kisumu strain in all sites.

Conclusion

There is high-intensity resistance to pyrethroids in southern Benin. However, pre-exposure to PBO significantly increased susceptibility to the pyrethroids in the different An. gambiae s.l. populations sampled. The use of PBO insecticide-treated bed nets may help maintain the gains in An. gambiae (s.l.) control in southern Benin.

Graphical Abstract

Background

The use of insecticides through indoor residual spraying (IRS) or long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) is a core component of vector control in all stages (i.e. control, pre-elimination, and elimination) of the global malaria elimination program [1]. In Benin, IRS and LLINs are the main vector control interventions implemented by the National Malaria Control Program (NMCP). However, while IRS is targeted in the northern part of Benin, LLINs are distributed throughout the country. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of these vector control tools, specifically LLINs, is hampered by the increasing vector resistance to pyrethroids, the principal insecticide on LLINs. Since 1999, malaria vectors in Benin have been reported to be resistant to all pyrethroids used for mosquito net impregnation, including permethrin, deltamethrin, and alpha-cypermethrin [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The most widely studied pyrethroid resistance mechanisms of An. gambiae s.l. are (1) modification of the insecticide target site by kdr mutation [11,12,13] and (2) overexpression of the detoxification enzymes using oxidases or glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) [14,15,16]. The kdr insecticide resistance mutation—a replacement of leucine by phenylalanine in the kdr 1014 gene (L1014F)—is widespread in West Africa [17,18,19], while the replacement with serine (L1014S) is widespread in some regions of Central and East Africa [20,21,22].

While insecticide resistance monitoring at the national level has shown an increase in phenotypic resistance and higher frequencies of resistance alleles in malaria vectors in some parts of the country [7, 9, 23], there are limited published reports on the intensity of resistance to insecticides used for vector control in Benin’s vector population (An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus s.l.). To mitigate the negative impacts of higher levels of insecticide resistance, a new generation of mosquito insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) has been developed with a combination of pyrethroids and a synergist, piperonyl butoxide (PBO). Some studies have found PBO effective in increasing mortality in resistant mosquitoes in southern Benin [14, 24, 25]. However, additional studies in different locations or in different years are still useful to better characterize the spatial and temporal landscape of resistance occurrence.

There has been a global rise in (1) the frequency of resistance alleles and (2) the intensity of phenotypic resistance of the vectors. In anticipation of a national scale-up of PBO-ITN deployment by Benin’s NMCP, we evaluated resistance intensity levels with and without pre-exposure to PBO in malaria vectors from areas with diverse ecologies thought to have high levels of insecticide resistance.

Methods

Study sites

This study was carried out from August 2017 to July 2018 in five communes in southern Benin: Cotonou, Porto-Novo, Allada, Adjohoun, and Bohicon (Fig. 1). These communes were selected based on their suspected insecticide resistance status and diverse ecology. Cotonou and Porto-Novo are urban areas located respectively in the Littoral and Ouémé departments in which IRS has never been implemented but where the population uses impregnated mosquito nets (LLINs), aerosol cans, and smoke coils to protect themselves against mosquito bites. In these communes, market gardening areas are well developed and represent the prolific larval habitats of An. gambiae s.l. The communes of Allada, Bohicon, and Adjohoun, located respectively in the departments of Atlantic, Zou, and Ouémé, are characterized by the production of food and cereal crops. Maize and tubers are the most widely cultivated crops and represent the staple foods of the populations in these communes. In addition to cereals and tubers, the commune of Adjohoun cultivates vegetables in large quantities during the dry season, as its soil is enriched by the silt deposited by annual floods caused by seasonal rainfall peaks in June, which is very favorable for vegetable and out-of-season crops. The commune of Bohicon is a forest area. The yearly average temperature in the south of Benin ranges from 21.9 to 32.8 °C and rainfall from 900 to 1100 mm [26].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study sites

Full size image

Larval collections

Larval collections were carried out with a dipper, trays, bowls, and a very fine mesh sieve (repurposed unused coffee filter) in the five communes. Larvae were brought to the insectary of Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC). Established procedures were used to optimize growth and prevent cannibalism [27]. The larvae were fed ground cat food. Each tray was covered with a veil and kept in the larval room of the insectary. The photoperiod was ensured by fluorescent lamps illuminating the larval room from 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Pupae were collected and inserted into 30 × 30 × 30 cm mosquito cages to maximize the collection of emerged adults. Mosquitoes were fed a 10% honey solution before susceptibility testing. Adult mosquitoes were identified with a magnifying glass and an Anopheles species identification key [28, 29].

WHO insecticide resistance intensity and synergist assay

For all WHO susceptibility assays, approximately 100 to 150 adult female An. gambiae s.l., aged 2 to 5 days, reared from larvae from each of the study sites were used in assays. For intensity assays, adult An. gambiae s.l. females from each of the communes were exposed to the diagnostic dose (1×), and 2×, 5×, and 10× the diagnostic dose of permethrin and deltamethrin to determine the level of resistance in the mosquito population. For synergist assays, mosquitoes were pre-exposed to papers treated with 4% PBO and then exposed to different doses of permethrin and deltamethrin to assess the level of oxidase involvement in the resistance of these vectors to pyrethroids. Each assay included control mosquitoes exposed to the paper impregnated only with silicone oil. The WHO procedure was followed for both intensity and synergist assay [30]. Mosquito mortality was observed and recorded after 24 h. Dead and live mosquitoes from the tests were stored in Eppendorf tubes with silica gel for molecular testing. All impregnated papers were obtained from WHO at the standard doses. Although the 2× deltamethrin (0.1%) and 2× permethrin (1.5%) are not part of WHO’s routine insecticide concentration offerings, WHO did provide this concentration of these two pyrethroids by special request.

Molecular analysis of mosquito species and insecticide resistance of An. gambiae s.l.

Molecular analyses were carried out on 100 mosquitoes per commune to identify the different mosquito species and evaluate the genes involved in An. gambiae s.l. resistance to insecticides. Using established protocols, dead and live mosquitoes from the WHO insecticide susceptibility tests were analyzed for the identification of sibling species of the An. gambiae complex [31] and the frequency of the resistance alleles, kdr-west [12] and ace-1R [32].

Biochemical assays of detoxifying enzymes in each An. gambiae s.l. population

To identify the different detoxification enzymes including the esterases, oxidases, and GSTs involved in vector resistance to insecticides, biochemical assays were carried out on 50 whole-bodied unexposed (mosquitoes from bioassay controls) females (2–5 days old) from the same mosquito population as that used for the WHO susceptibility test. Protocols described in the MR4 manual [33] were followed. Total soluble protein analysis was done to correct for any variation in enzyme levels based on size differences between the different mosquito populations. Results from these biochemical tests were compared with a laboratory Kisumu susceptible strain of the same age (2–5 days old).

Statistical analysis

The resistance status of malaria vectors was determined according to WHO criteria [30] as follows:

  •  ≥ 98% mortality 24 h after insecticide exposure, the An. gambiae s.l. population is susceptible

  • Between 90 and 97% mortality 24 h after insecticide exposure, the An. gambiae s.l. population is suspected of being resistant (requires confirmation)

  •  < 90% mortality 24 h after insecticide exposure, the An. gambiae s.l. population is resistant

No mortality was recorded in controls. Therefore, Abbott's formula was not necessary to correct the mortality rates.

To determine the increased mortality caused by PBO pre-exposure followed by deltamethrin or permethrin exposure, the mortality rate difference and 95% confidence interval were calculated for deltamethrin and permethrin groups exposed and not exposed to PBO at all study sites. Pearson’s χ2 test was done to determine the level of significance in the insecticide groups at all study sites. The allele frequencies of kdr L1014F and Ace-1R G119S were calculated to assess their variability in the populations, as follows:

$$ F \, \left( R \right) \, = \, \left[ {2n{\text{RR }} + \, n{\text{RS}}} \right] \, / \, \left[ {2\left( {n{\text{RR }} + \, n{\text{RS }} + \, n{\text{SS}}} \right)} \right] $$

where F(R) is the frequency of resistance, n is the number of mosquitoes of a given genotype, RR is the homozygous resistant genotype, RS is the heterozygous resistant genotype, and SS is the susceptible genotype [12, 32].

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the variation in enzyme activity in each locality. Tukey's multiple comparison test was used to compare enzyme activity between susceptible Kisumu laboratory mosquitoes and those collected in the field. All statistical analyses were performed using R 3.3.2 software.

Results

Deltamethrin and permethrin resistance intensity in An. gambiae s.l.

A total of 1697 female An. gambiae s.l. were exposed to different deltamethrin doses in all study sites. At 24 h post-exposure, the mortality rate at the diagnostic dose 1× varied across sites. The lowest mosquito mortality rates at 1× were observed in Bohicon (12%), Porto-Novo (15%), and Cotonou (16%). Mortality rates in Adjohoun (44%) and Allada (44%) were higher but were well below the WHO threshold of ≥ 98% mortality for susceptible mosquito populations. Though mortality increased at all sites with increasing dosage of deltamethrin, the WHO threshold of ≥ 98% mortality was still not achieved, even at 10× the diagnostic dose; this suggests high-intensity resistance to deltamethrin (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mortality of An. gambiae s.l. after exposure to increasing doses of deltamethrin, using the WHO tube test (error bars represent the standard errors; the broken red line is the threshold for suspected resistance, the solid line indicates the threshold for confirmed resistance)

Full size image

Results with permethrin were similar to those observed with deltamethrin. A total of 1296 female An. gambiae s.l. were exposed to the different doses in all study sites. The lowest mortality rates at the diagnostic dose (1×) were observed in Porto-Novo (14%), Allada (18%), and Bohicon (22%). The mortality rate in both Adjohoun and Cotonou was 44%. Likewise, at all sites, permethrin susceptibility increased as mosquitoes were exposed to higher doses of insecticide; however, none of the assays achieved the WHO threshold of ≥ 98% mortality, suggesting a high intensity of permethrin resistance (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mortality of An. gambiae s.l. after exposure to increasing doses of permethrin, using the WHO tube test (error bars represent the standard errors; the broken red line is the threshold for suspected resistance, the solid line indicates the threshold for confirmed resistance)

Full size image

Susceptibility of An. gambiae s.l. to deltamethrin and permethrin after PBO pre-exposure

After PBO pre-exposure, mortality after exposure to deltamethrin ranged from 65% in Cotonou to 99% in Allada at 1×; from 97% in Cotonou and Adjohoun to 100% in Allada at 2×; and from 99% in Cotonou to 100% in Bohicon, Allada, and Porto-Novo at 5× (Fig. 4). For permethrin, pre-exposure to PBO also led to an increase in An. gambiae s.l. mortality, with rates ranging from 50% in Porto-Novo to 85% in Adjohoun at 1×; from 89% in Porto-Novo to 99% in Bohicon at 2×; and from 92% in Allada to 100% in Bohicon at 5× (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The mortality rate for An. gambiae s.l. after exposure to increasing doses of deltamethrin combined with the synergist PBO, using the WHO tube test (error bars represent the standard errors; the broken red line is the threshold for suspected resistance, the solid line indicates the threshold for confirmed resistance)

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

The mortality rate for An. gambiae s.l. after exposure to increasing doses of permethrin associated with the synergist PBO, using the WHO tube test (error bars represent the standard errors of the mortality rate at the y-axis; below the broken red line suggests suspected resistance, below the solid line signifies confirmed resistance)

Full size image

For deltamethrin, the mortality rate difference ranged from 48% in Cotonou to 81% in Bohicon; across sites, there was a significant increase of 61% (p < 0.001) in the mortality rate for An. gambiae s.l. after pre-exposing mosquitoes to PBO and then exposing them to deltamethrin at the diagnostic dose (Table 1). For permethrin, the mortality rate difference ranged from 31% in Cotonou to 50% in Bohicon; across sites, there was a significant increase of 39% (p < 0.001) in the mortality rate in An. gambiae s.l. after pre-exposing mosquitoes to PBO and then exposing them to permethrin at the diagnostic dose (Table 2).

Table 1 Mortality rate difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1× deltamethrin with and without pre-exposure to PBO
Full size table
Table 2 Mortality rate difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1× permethrin with and without pre-exposure to PBO
Full size table

Species identification and allelic frequency of kdr-west and ace-1R genes

Species identification results revealed two species of An. gambiae s.l. in Porto-Novo, Bohicon, Cotonou, and Adjohoun, with a predominance of An. coluzzii in Porto-Novo (79%) and Adjohoun (96%), and An. gambiae s.s. in Cotonou (98%) and Bohicon (56%). In Allada, An. coluzzii was the only species (100%) of the An. gambiae complex recorded. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results also showed a high frequency of the Kdr-west mutation in the five study sites; the allelic frequency for An. gambiae s.s. in Porto-Novo, Bohicon, Adjohoun, and Cotonou was 0.76, 0.82, 1.00, and 0.92, respectively. The same result was observed in An. coluzzii, with 0.75 in Cotonou, 0.82 in Porto-Novo, 0.84 in Bohicon, 0.87 in Adjohoun, and 0.76 in Allada. However, no significant difference in allelic frequency was recorded between An. gambiae and An. coluzzii from different sites (Table 3). The allelic frequency of Ace-1R was very low in both species across the five study sites, with values ranging from 0.001 in Bohicon to 0.03 in Cotonou for An. gambiae, and from 0.001 in Bohicon to 0.01 in Adjohoun and Allada for An. coluzzii (Table 3).

Table 3 Allelic frequencies of Kdr and Ace-1 in Anopheles gambiae s.l. of Cotonou, Porto-Novo, Bohicon, Allada, and Adjohoun
Full size table

Enzymatic activity in An. gambiae s.l. from each commune

The analysis of the enzymatic activity of An. gambiae s.l. compared to the Kisumu susceptible reference strain showed overexpression of nonspecific α- and β-esterases in Cotonou (pα = 0.5607, pβ = 0.0001), Porto-Novo (pα = 0.0001, pβ < 0.0001), and Bohicon (pα = 0.0009, pβ < 0.0001). In the commune of Allada, the expression of these enzymes was similar (pα = 0.1519, pβ = 0.1803), unlike in Adjohoun (pα < 0.0001, pβ = 0.0307), where under-expression of these enzymes was observed compared to the Kisumu susceptible strain. For oxidases, expression similar to that of the Kisumu susceptible strain (p > 0.5493) was recorded in all study sites. For GST, enzymatic activity was significantly higher in field strains compared to the Kisumu strain in all study sites (p < 0.0001) except Porto-Novo (p = 0.4613) and Adjohoun (p = 0.1612), where no significant differences were observed (Fig. 6; Table 4).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Box-and-whisker plot of the detoxification enzymes [nonspecific esterases (α- and β-esterases), mixed-function oxidases (MFO), and glutathione S-transferase (GST)] in the laboratory colony strain, An. gambiae s.s. (Kisumu) and wild An. gambiae s.l. populations from Adjohoun, Allada, Bohicon, Cotonou, and Porto-Novo. (The boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles of individual mosquito measurements; the horizontal black line within the box indicates the median, and the x indicates the mean)

Full size image
Table 4 Result of statistical analysis of mean (± SE) mixed-function oxidase, glutathione S-transferase, and esterase activity in An. gambiae s.l. populations
Full size table

Discussion

This study showed a high intensity of deltamethrin and permethrin resistance in An. gambiae s.l. using different insecticide doses in southern Benin. It also showed an increase in mortality from deltamethrin and permethrin after pre-exposure to PBO. Molecular analysis showed high levels of kdr resistance alleles in mosquito populations but low levels of ace-1 alleles. High biochemical test levels showed overexpression of GSTs and esterases but not oxidases.

Before 2020, all ITNs distributed in Benin’s mass campaigns or through continuous distribution channels consisted only of standard ITNs. In this study, the resistance of An. gambiae s.l. to the diagnostic dose (1×) of permethrin and deltamethrin was observed in all southern Benin tested sites, confirming the resistance status of An. gambiae s.l. reported in past investigations in Benin [2,3,4, 7, 34]. In most sites, An. gambiae s.l. clearly showed a high tolerance to 2×, 5×, and 10× the diagnostic dose of permethrin and deltamethrin, suggesting high resistance as defined by WHO [30]. The results of this study are alarming, because insecticide-based vector control failure is thought to occur when mosquitoes exhibit insecticide resistance at 5× or 10× of the diagnostic dose [30]. Though ITNs may still act as a physical barrier to infectious mosquito bites, the killing effect of the net may be severely diminished. National coverage of LLINs is a major part of the malaria control strategy in Benin’s National Malaria Control Program (NMCP). These findings indicate that the effectiveness of the sole vector control strategy—mass distribution of mosquito bed nets treated with pyrethroids only—in southern Benin could be threatened by high pyrethroid resistance in the mosquito population [35]. In response to this reduced effectiveness of insecticides, NMCP distributed PBO-ITNs in 2020 in about 19 communes (25%) selected from southern to central Benin to mitigate the potential negative impact of resistance on insecticide effectiveness. In line with the vision of increasing the effectiveness of vector control tools, Benin plans to cover more than 60% of the country's 77 communes in 2023 with PBO-ITNs in the next mass distribution campaign.

Similar to other studies in Benin [3, 9, 24], there was a significant increase in mortality from deltamethrin and permethrin at the diagnostic dose after PBO pre-exposure; additionally, the increase in mortality was greater for PBO plus deltamethrin than PBO plus permethrin at the diagnostic dose. However, in this study, complete restoration to the WHO threshold of susceptibility (≥ 98% mortality) at the diagnostic dose [30] occurred only for PBO plus deltamethrin in Allada. In some sites, even exposure to 5× permethrin + PBO was not able to completely restore insecticide susceptibility to WHO threshold levels. Nonetheless, there was still a significant increase in mortality in the mosquitoes pre-exposed to PBO versus mosquitoes exposed to deltamethrin or permethrin only.

In addition to the high prevalence of permethrin and deltamethrin insecticide resistance in An. gambiae s.l., the kdr-west allele was found at high frequencies, ranging from 75 to 100%. This suggests near fixation of the kdr-west resistance allele in the southern Benin vector population. Previous studies on the spatial dynamics of insecticide resistance in Benin [7, 10, 11, 36] have characterized the distribution of kdr-west in time and space. These studies have suggested that various ecological pressures shape the mosquito populations. Though this was not investigated in the present study, the high level of resistance of An. gambiae s.l. in southern Benin could be explained by the high selective pressure from different uses of insecticides, such as through (1) protective measures taken against adult mosquito bites (i.e. LLINs or spray aerosols), (2) agricultural insecticide runoff into mosquito larval sites, or (3) the combined effect of the two. It is likely that sustained ecological pressure continues to expand the kdr-west alleles in the mosquito population and potentially limits the effectiveness of vector control strategies such as LLINs [37].

The effect of PBO combined with pyrethroids implies that cytochrome P450 mono-oxygenases were highly involved in the resistance of An. gambiae s.l. to deltamethrin and permethrin in all the study sites [38, 39]. However, the results of the enzymatic assays, which were performed on the same vector population and compared to the An. gambiae s.s. Kisumu (insecticide-susceptible strain), did not show an over-expression of the oxidases in the different study sites. It has been speculated that the interaction between fitness cost and resistance conferred by mutations in the oxidase genes may “facilitate the loss of overproduction” [40, 41], since studies have shown that overproduction of P450 oxidases can affect “endogenous molecules in insects” [42]. This may explain why PBO pre-exposure increased mortality but was not over-expressed in biochemical assays. It is not clear whether there is another mechanism of resistance not elucidated in this study. It may be useful to conduct follow-up tests to explain this anomaly. There was high activity of GSTs, which suggests that in wild populations of An. gambiae s.l. in Cotonou, Bohicon, and Allada, these enzymes could play a major role in the resistance to pyrethroids due to the detoxification of products derived from peroxidation of lipids induced by pyrethroids [43]. Therefore, these enzymes (GST) could increase phenotypic resistance by widening the spectrum of insecticide resistance mechanisms [44]. These results reinforce the idea that there could be other insecticide resistance mechanisms in An. gambiae s.l. in addition to kdr, the oxidases, and GSTs, which are involved in the resistance of this vector to pyrethroids.

Conclusion

This study identified An. gambiae s.l. with high resistance levels to pyrethroids in southern Benin. The level of resistance in An. gambiae s.l. is alarming with respect to the implications for pyrethroid-based control strategies. While standard LLINs provide a physical barrier to mosquito bites, the killing effect of the net may be limited by the resistance levels in southern Benin communes. The increase in the mortality rates when mosquitoes were exposed to deltamethrin and permethrin after exposure to PBO suggests that the use of PBO-ITNs (PermaNet 3.0 and Olyset Plus) may mitigate the effect of insecticide resistance and maintain the gains achieved with the mass distribution of standard LLINs.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. WHO. Guidelines for Malaria Vector Control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

  2. Aikpon R, Sezonlin M, Osse R, Akogbeto M. Evidence of multiple mechanisms providing carbamate and organophosphate resistance in field An. gambiae population from Atacora in Benin. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:568.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aizoun N, Aikpon R, Gnanguenon V, Oussou O, Agossa F, Padonou G, Akogbeto M. Status of organophosphate and carbamate resistance in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato from the south and north Benin West Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Akogbeto M, Yakoubou S. Resistance of malaria vectors to pyrethrins used for impregnating mosquito nets in Benin, West Africa. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1999;92:123–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Badirou K, Ossè R, Yadouleton A, Attolou R, Youssouf R, Gnaguenon V, Akinrou B, Govoétchan R, Akogbeto M. Redistribution of kdr L1014F and ace-1mutations involved in the resistance of vectors to insecticides in Benin. Asian J Pharm Sci Technol. 2016;6:48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Djegbe I, Boussari O, Sidick A, Martin T, Ranson H, Chandre F, Akogbeto M, Corbel V. Dynamics of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors in Benin: first evidence of the presence of L1014S kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae from West Africa. Malar J. 2011;10:261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gnanguenon V, Agossa FR, Badirou K, Govoetchan R, Anagonou R, Oke-Agbo F, Azondekon R, AgbanrinYoussouf R, Attolou R, Tokponnon FT, et al. Malaria vectors resistance to insecticides in Benin: current trends and mechanisms involved. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Padonou GG, Gbedjissi G, Yadouleton A, Azondekon R, Razack O, Oussou O, Gnanguenon V, Rock A, Sezonlin M, Akogbeto M. Decreased proportions of indoor feeding and endophily in Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations following the indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated net interventions in Benin (West Africa). Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salako AS, Ahogni I, Kpanou C, Sovi A, Azondekon R, Sominahouin AA, Tokponnon F, Gnanguenon V, Dagnon F, Iyikirenga L, Akogbeto MC. Baseline entomologic data on malaria transmission in prelude to an indoor residual spraying intervention in the regions of Alibori and Donga, Northern Benin West Africa. Malar J. 2018;17:392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yadouleton AW, Padonou G, Asidi A, Moiroux N, Bio-Banganna S, Corbel V, N’Guessan R, Gbenou D, Yacoubou I, Gazard K, Akogbeto MC. Insecticide resistance status in Anopheles gambiae in southern Benin. Malar J. 2010;9:83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Djogbenou L, Pasteur N, Bio-Bangana S, Baldet T, Irish SR, Akogbeto M, Weill M, Chandre F. Malaria vectors in the Republic of Benin: distribution of species and molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Acta Trop. 2010;114:116–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Berge JB, Devonshire AL, Guillet P, Pasteur N, Pauron D. Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998;7:179–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule JM, Wang X, Hemingway J, Collins FH. Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2000;9:491–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Djouaka R, Irving H, Tukur Z, Wondji CS. Exploring mechanisms of multiple insecticide resistance in a population of the malaria vector Anopheles funestus in Benin. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27760.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell SN, Stevenson BJ, Muller P, Wilding CS, Egyir-Yawson A, Field SG, Hemingway J, Paine MJ, Ranson H, Donnelly MJ. Identification and validation of a gene causing cross-resistance between insecticide classes in Anopheles gambiae from Ghana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:6147–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stevenson BJ, Bibby J, Pignatelli P, Muangnoicharoen S, O’Neill PM, Lian LY, Muller P, Nikou D, Steven A, Hemingway J, et al. Cytochrome P450 6M2 from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae metabolizes pyrethroids: sequential metabolism of deltamethrin revealed. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;41:492–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Awolola TS, Oyewole IO, Amajoh CN, Idowu ET, Ajayi MB, Oduola A, Manafa OU, Ibrahim K, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M. Distribution of the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae and pyrethroid knock down resistance gene in Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2005;95:204–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dabire KR, Diabate A, Agostinho F, Alves F, Manga L, Faye O, Baldet T. Distribution of the members of Anopheles gambiae and pyrethroid knock-down resistance gene (kdr) in Guinea-Bissau West Africa. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2008;101:119–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Akoobeto M, Guiguemde TR, Darriet F, Brengues C, Guillet P, Hemingway J, Small GJ, Hougard JM. The role of agricultural use of insecticides in resistance to pyrethroids in Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:617–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdalla H, Matambo TS, Koekemoer LL, Mnzava AP, Hunt RH, Coetzee M. Insecticide susceptibility and vector status of natural populations of Anopheles arabiensis from Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:263–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Etang J, Fondjo E, Chandre F, Morlais I, Brengues C, Nwane P, Chouaibou M, Ndjemai H, Simard F. First report of knockdown mutations in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae from Cameroon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:795–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kulkarni MA, Rowland M, Alifrangis M, Mosha FW, Matowo J, Malima R, Peter J, Kweka E, Lyimo I, Magesa S, et al. Occurrence of the leucine-to-phenylalanine knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation in Anopheles arabiensis populations in Tanzania, detected by a simplified high-throughput SSOP-ELISA method. Malar J. 2006;5:56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Koukpo CZ, Fassinou A, Osse RA, Agossa FR, Sovi A, Sewade WT, Aboubakar S, Assogba BS, Akogbeto MC, Sezonlin M. The current distribution and characterization of the L1014F resistance allele of the kdr gene in three malaria vectors (Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles coluzzii, Anopheles arabiensis) in Benin (West Africa). Malar J. 2019;18:175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Akoton R, Tchigossou GM, Djegbe I, Yessoufou A, Atoyebi MS, Tossou E, Zeukeng F, Boko P, Irving H, Adeoti R, et al. Experimental huts trial of the efficacy of pyrethroids/piperonyl butoxide (PBO) net treatments for controlling multi-resistant populations of Anopheles funestus s.s. in Kpome, Southern Benin. Welcome Open Res. 2018;3:71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ngufor C, N’Guessan R, Fagbohoun J, Subramaniam K, Odjo A, Fongnikin A, Akogbeto M, Weetman D, Rowland M. Insecticide resistance profile of Anopheles gambiae from a phase II field station in Cove, southern Benin: implications for the evaluation of novel vector control products. Malar J. 2015;14:464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Climate Change Knowledge Portal. [https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/]

  27. Koenraadt CJM, Majambere S, Hemerik L, Takken W. The effects of food and space on the occurrence of cannibalism and predation among larvae of Anopheles gambiae s.l. Entomol Exp Appl. 2004;112:125–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Coetzee M. Key to the females of Afrotropical Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Malar J. 2020;19:70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gillies MT, De Meillon B. The Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Ethiopian Zoogeographical Region). Publ South Afr Inst Med Res. 1968;54:1–343.

    Google Scholar 

  30. WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes, 2nd edn. 2016.

  31. Santolamazza F, Calzetta M, Etang J, Barrese E, Dia I, Caccone A, Donnelly MJ, Petrarca V, Simard F, Pinto J, della Torre A. Distribution of knock-down resistance mutations in Anopheles gambiae molecular forms in west and west-central Africa. Malar J. 2008;7:74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Weill M, Malcolm C, Chandre F, Mogensen K, Berthomieu A, Marquine M, Raymond M. The unique mutation in ace-1 giving high insecticide resistance is easily detectable in mosquito vectors. Insect Mol Biol. 2004;13:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. MR4. Methods in Anopheles Research. Atlanta USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015.

  34. Yadouleton AW, Asidi A, Djouaka RF, Braima J, Agossou CD, Akogbeto MC. Development of vegetable farming: a cause of the emergence of insecticide resistance in populations of Anopheles gambiae in urban areas of Benin. Malar J. 2009;8:103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chouaibou M, Etang J, Brevault T, Nwane P, Hinzoumbe CK, Mimpfoundi R, Simard F. Dynamics of insecticide resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.l. from an area of extensive cotton cultivation in Northern Cameroon. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:476–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sovi A, Djegbe I, Soumanou L, Tokponnon F, Gnanguenon V, Azondekon R, Oke-Agbo F, Oke M, Adechoubou A, Massougbodji A, et al. Microdistribution of the resistance of malaria vectors to deltamethrin in the region of Plateau (southeastern Benin) in preparation for an assessment of the impact of resistance on the effectiveness of Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs). BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Agossa FR, Aikpon R, Azondekon R, Govoetchan R, Padonnou GG, Oussou O, Oke-Agbo F, Akogbeto MC. Efficacy of various insecticides recommended for indoor residual spraying: pirimiphos methyl, potential alternative to bendiocarb for pyrethroid resistance management in Benin, West Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2014;108:84–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ishaaya I. Insect detoxifying enzymes: their importance in pesticide synergism and resistance. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1993;22:263–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Miller TA. Mechanisms of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Parasitol Today. 1988;4:S8-12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Berge JB, Feyereisen R, Amichot M. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases and insecticide resistance in insects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998;353:1701–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor M, Feyereisen R. Molecular biology and evolution of resistance of toxicants. Mol Biol Evol. 1996;13:719–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cùany A, Pralavorio M, Pauron D, Berge JB, Fournier D, Blais C, Lafont R, Salaun JP, Weissbart D, Larroque C, Lange R. Characterization of microsomal oxidative activities in a wild-type and in a DDT resistant strain of Drosophila melanogaster. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 1990;37:293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hemingway J, Hawkes NJ, McCarroll L, Ranson H. The molecular basis of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;34:653–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Vontas JG, Small GJ, Hemingway J. Glutathione S-transferases as antioxidant defence agents confer pyrethroid resistance in Nilaparvata lugens. Biochem J. 2001;357:65–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the President’s Malaria Initiative, which provided financial support for this study. We would also like to acknowledge Monica Patton, Patrick Condo, Peter Thomas, Irish Seth, and Raymond Beach of the CDC, who provided technical support for the study and critically revised the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the United States President’s Malaria Initiative through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou, Cotonou, Benin

    Hermann Watson Sagbohan, Casimir D. Kpanou, Razaki Osse, Germain G. Padonou, André Aimé Sominahouin, Albert Sourou Salako, Aboubakar Sidick, Wilfried Sewade, Bruno Akinro & Martin Akogbeto

  2. Faculty of Science and Technology of the University of Abomey-Calavi, Godomey, Benin

    Hermann Watson Sagbohan, Casimir D. Kpanou, Germain G. Padonou, Albert Sourou Salako & Clément Agbangla

  3. National University of Agriculture of Porto-Novo, Porto-Novo, Benin

    Razaki Osse

  4. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Lagos, Nigeria

    Fortuné Dagnon

  5. Genetics and Biotechnology Laboratory of the UAC, Godomey, Benin

    Clément Agbangla

  6. US President’s Malaria Initiative, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, USA

    Daniel Impoinvil

  7. US President’s Malaria Initiative, US Agency for International Development, Cotonou, Benin

    Saadani Ahmed

Authors
  1. Hermann Watson Sagbohan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Casimir D. Kpanou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Razaki Osse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fortuné Dagnon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Germain G. Padonou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. André Aimé Sominahouin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Albert Sourou Salako
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Aboubakar Sidick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wilfried Sewade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Bruno Akinro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Saadani Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Daniel Impoinvil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Clément Agbangla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Martin Akogbeto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WHS, CDK, CA, and MCA conceived the study. WHS, CDK, ASS, GGP, FD, AAS, SA, RO, DI, CA, and MCA participated in the design of the study. Entomologic data was collected by WHS, CDK, ASS, and AAS. Bioassays and laboratory analysis were carried out by WHS, CDK, WS, and AS. WHS, DI, and MCA drafted the manuscript. Statistical data analysis was performed by BA. DI, SA, CA, and MCA critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermann Watson Sagbohan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), or the United States President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI). Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the CDC, USAID, PMI, or the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sagbohan, H.W., Kpanou, C.D., Osse, R. et al. Intensity and mechanisms of deltamethrin and permethrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations in southern Benin. Parasites Vectors 14, 202 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04699-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04699-1

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us