- Open Access
High quality RNA isolation from Aedes aegypti midguts using laser microdissection microscopy
© Hong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 4 May 2011
- Accepted: 19 May 2011
- Published: 19 May 2011
Laser microdissection microscopy (LMM) has potential as a research tool because it allows precise excision of target tissues or cells from a complex biological specimen, and facilitates tissue-specific sample preparation. However, this method has not been used in mosquito vectors to date. To this end, we have developed an LMM method to isolate midgut RNA using Aedes aegypti.
Total RNA was isolated from Ae. aegypti midguts that were either fresh-frozen or fixed with histological fixatives. Generally, fresh-frozen tissue sections are a common source of quality LMM-derived RNA; however, our aim was to develop an LMM protocol that could inactivate pathogenic viruses by fixation, while simultaneously preserving RNA from arbovirus-infected mosquitoes. Three groups (10 - 15 mosquitoes per group) of female Ae. aegypti at 24 or 48-hours post-blood meal were intrathoracically injected with one of seven common fixatives (Bouin's, Carnoy's, Formoy's, Cal-Rite, 4% formalin, 10% neutral buffered formalin, or zinc formalin) to evaluate their effect on RNA quality. Total RNA was isolated from the fixed abdomens using a Trizol® method. The results indicated that RNA from Carnoy's and Bouin's fixative samples was comparable to that of fresh frozen midguts (control) in duplicate experiments. When Carnoy's and Bouin's were used to fix the midguts for the LMM procedure, however, Carnoy's-fixed RNA clearly showed much less degradation than Bouin's-fixed RNA. In addition, a sample of 5 randomly chosen transcripts were amplified more efficiently using the Carnoy's treated LMM RNA than Bouin's-fixed RNA in quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assays, suggesting there were more intact target mRNAs in the Carnoy's fixed RNA. The yields of total RNA ranged from 0.3 to 19.0 ng per ~3.0 × 106 μm2 in the LMM procedure.
Carnoy's fixative was found to be highly compatible with LMM, producing high quality RNA from Ae. aegypti midguts while inactivating viral pathogens. Our findings suggest that LMM in conjunction with Carnoy's fixation can be applied to studies in Ae. aegypti infected with arboviruses without compromising biosafety and RNA quality. This LMM method should be applicable to other mosquito vector studies.
- Mosquito Vector
- Mosquito Midgut
- Midgut Tissue
- Histological Fixative
- Biological Extract
The ability to isolate a specific type or a subpopulation of cells from tissue composed of heterogeneous cell types is highly desirable for many experimental investigations. A homogeneous sample will represent a more congruent cellular response to either biotic or abiotic stimuli compared to an admixture of different cell types. Use of homogeneous biological samples, therefore, is likely to enhance detection power of cellular changes in quantitative assays such as quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), microarrays, and proteome analyses [1–3]. In this regard, LMM has proven to be a powerful tool because it allows direct isolation of tissues and cells of interest based on morphology or tagging using laser-aided excision under a microscope [4, 5]. While LMM has been widely utilized for molecular analyses of pathological samples from humans and other vertebrates and invertebrates [6, 7], it has rarely been used in insects, with the exception of Drosophila melanogaster[8–11]. As mosquitoes play a key role in infectious disease transmission, development of an LMM method for mosquito vectors will facilitate gene expression profiling and lead to a better understanding of gene function relevant to disease transmission.
To perform LMM, fresh tissues may be embedded in a cryo-medium (e.g., O.C.T., Tissue-Tek, CA) by snap-freezing without fixation [5, 8]. Rapid freezing of fresh tissues in a cryo-medium immediately after dissection helps preserve the quality of biological extracts such as RNA, DNAs, and proteins . However, tissue samples are often fixed with a histological fixative and subsequently embedded in paraffin [5, 12]. This fixation and embedding process can protect structural integrity of tissues for an extended period of time. Because visual identification of target regions is necessary for excision in tissues by microscopy, maintenance of cellular morphology by proper fixation is critical. However, some fixatives may have harmful effects on cellular extracts. In particular, cross-linking fixatives such as paraformaldehyde (or formalin) and glutaraldehyde have been reported to cause considerable degradation of RNA in tissues [13, 14]. Despite this potentially detrimental undertaking, fixation may be absolutely necessary when mosquitoes are infected with infectious pathogens that require inactivation . Therefore, caution needs to be taken in optimizing a method of fixation to obtain the best preservation of biological extracts for post-LMM analyses when infectious materials are processed. With the promising utility of LMM for mosquito vector research, we have established a practical LMM method utilizing Carnoy's, a commonly available fixative, for use in Aedes aegypti. In the present study, we have demonstrated the feasibility of the LMM method using Ae. aegypti as a model, and we believe that this method can be readily applied to other mosquito vectors.
The Rockefeller strain of Aedes aegypti was reared at 25°C and 80% relative humidity under a 12 h light: 12 h dark photoperiod in the laboratory following a general mosquito rearing guide . Adult mosquitoes were supplied with a cotton ball soaked in a 10% sucrose solution ad libitum and fed on sheep blood meal (Hemostat Laboratories, Dixon, CA) for one hour using a glass membrane feeder (Lillie Glasswork, Atlanta, GA) once a week for egg production. The membrane feeder was kept at 37°C by circulating preheated water through a water bath during blood feeding. Larval mosquitoes were provided with 10% suspension of bovine liver powder (MP Biochemicals, Cat# ICN90039601) in distilled water.
Fixation of Mosquitoes
▪ Bouin's (Ricca Chemical, Cat# 1120)
▪ Carnoy's (10 ml glacial acetic acid, 30 ml chloroform, 60 ml 95% ethanol)
▪ Formoy's (10 ml acetic acid, 30 ml 40% formaldehyde, 60 ml 95% ethanol)
▪ Cal-Rite (Thermo Scientific, Cat# 5501)
▪ 4% formalin in PBS (pH 7.4, USB Chemicals Cat# 19943)
▪ 10% neutral buffered formalin (Thermo Scientific, Cat# 5701)
▪ Zinc Formalin (Thermo Scientific, Cat# 5701ZF).
Cryosectioning and Laser Microdissection Microscopy (LMM)
After fixation with either Bouin's or Carnoy's fixative, 5-6 mosquito abdomens were dissected and embedded in the same orientation in O.C.T. Compound (Sakura Tissue-Tek, Torrence, CA) in aluminum foil cryomold (1.5 cm3). The embedded abdomens were snap-frozen by placing the cryomolds in an ethanol/dry ice bath. The embedded abdomens were prepared in triplicate and kept at -80°C until used. Laser microdissection was performed following the method described by Jones et al.  and Gobert et al.  with some modifications. Briefly, the embedded mosquitoes were cut across abdomens at 8 μm thickness with a knife pre-chilled to -25°C using a cryostat microtome (Leica Model CM3050 S). Before sectioning, the blade was cleansed with the RNAse Zap solution (Ambion, CA) to remove potential nuclease contamination. Mosquito abdomen sections were collected on adhesive membrane slides (P.A.L.M. Microlaser Technologies, Cat# 1440-1600). Each slide could accommodate 12-15 sections without overlapping. Following cryosectioning, samples were air-dried and kept in nuclease-free containers at room temperature until microdissection was performed.
Microdissection of mosquito midguts was performed using a P.A.L.M. laser microdissection system http://www.palm-microlaser.com equipped with a Zeiss Axiovert S100 microscope and its operating software (version 2.2). The cutting energy level of the laser beam was set to ~80% of the full output of the LMM unit. Microdissected midgut cells were captured onto PCR tube caps filled with adhesive gel (P.A.L.M. Microlaser Technologies, Cat# 1440-0260) and two independent collections for Bouin's and Carnoy's fixative were prepared for further analysis. Caps with dissected cells were placed in 200 μl PCR tubes stored at -80°C until RNA isolation.
RNA isolation from LMM samples and frozen sections
Total RNA from laser-dissected tissues was isolated using the RNAqueous™ Micro kit according to manufacture's directions (Ambion, CA; Cat# 1931). This kit has been developed to optimize RNA isolation from LMM-cut tissues and cells. Briefly, 20 μl of lysis buffer was added into the LMM cap/PCR tube assembly and incubated for 30 min at 42°C with the caps positioned upside-down and touching the heating block. After incubation, the assembly was briefly centrifuged to collect the extraction fluid in the microcentrifuge tube. Then, an additional 80 μl of lysis buffer was added to a final volume of 100 μl. To each sample, 3 μl of the LMM Additive of the RNAqueous™ Micro kit was added, briefly mixed, and centrifuged. To recover total RNA, 1.25 × volumes (129 μl) of 95% ethanol was added to the samples and mixed by brief vortexing. Then, sample lysates were loaded onto spin columns, washed several times, and the total cellular RNA eluted twice each with 10 μl of elution buffer. To remove potential genomic DNA contaminants, the eluted RNA samples were treated with DNase I by adding 1/10 elution volume 10× DNase I buffer and 1 μl DNase I to each sample. After gentle but thorough mixing, the samples were incubated for 30 min at 37°C, after which DNase I reactions were stopped by adding 2 μl DNase Inactivation Reagent to each RNA sample followed by 2 min incubation at room temperature. The final RNA samples were stored at -20°C until use. As a control, total RNA was isolated from abdomens of five mosquitoes using TRIzol® reagent http://www.invitrogen.com after snap-freezing without any fixation, as described above. The integrity of the RNA samples was assessed using Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit and an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system according to the directions provided by the manufacturer http://www.chem.agilent.com.
Quantitative Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays
Primer sequences used to amplify the target transcripts from total RNAs isolated from LMM-cut Aedes aegypti midgut tissues.
Primer sequence (5' to 3')
Forward: AACCAAGCAAACCCAAACC Reverse: AGGATACCGTTGGCATCG
Heat shock cognate 70
AAEL015246 and AAEL012410
Forward:GCGGACGTAACTCATCCAC Reverse: CCCTGGTGACTGCAGAGATAG
AGO1a and b
Forward: TCAAGCAGACGAACCAAA Reverse: ATGGCACGAAGTTCTATGG
Forward: TCTAACGCATACGCACCAC Reverse: TGTCGTCACCAGAGCAATG
Optimum Fixative for Preservation of Mosquito RNA
We tested seven different fixatives to examine their ability to preserve RNA quality following isolation from the mosquito abdomen harvested at 24 or 48-hr post-blood meal. These two time points were chosen because female mosquito midguts experience substantial physiological and mechanical changes such as stretching of midgut epithelial cells and induction of gene expression up to 48 hours after blood meal [18, 19].
Laser Microdissection and RNA Extraction from Mosquito Midguts
Yields of total RNAs prepared from microdissected Aedes aegypti midgut tissues.
24 Hours Post Bloodmeal
48 Hours Post Bloodmeal
RNA Conc. (pg/μl)
Total Yield (ng/20 μl)
Threshold cycle (Ct) values of quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) amplification.
ago1a & b
RNA Integrity and Fidelity
Tissue or cell-specific preparation of biological extracts such as nucleic acids and proteins is critical for detecting cellular changes leading to mRNA or protein modulations. For example, viral infections in the mosquito midgut often are not systemic but form isolated infection foci . If entire mosquitoes or abdomens are used for testing, uninfected cells will overwhelmingly outnumber virus-infected cells, thus masking or diluting transcriptional changes in virus-infected cells. Using Ae. aegypti midguts as a model, we have demonstrated that an LMM method can be effectively employed to prepare high quality total RNA in a tissue-specific manner. We were able to isolate high quality RNA from snap-frozen Ae. aegypti midguts that was also used as a control throughout the present study. However, as mosquitoes are vectors of many infectious pathogens, infected samples may require a histological fixative to inactivate pathogens for biosafety reasons.
We set out to test seven commonly used histological fixatives to evaluate their effects on RNA integrity of Ae. aegypti midguts. Among the tested fixatives, Carnoy's fixative RNA had the most prominent 18/28S bands and showed minimal accumulation of small RNA species of degradation, thus providing the best preservation of total RNA and virus inactivation for use in the LMM procedure. The acidic Carnoy's fixative quenches fluorescence from green fluorescent protein (GFP) that is widely used for protein tagging, but this quenching is reversible by 30 min washing in borate buffer (pH 8.5) and subsequent overnight incubation in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) at 4°C [21, 22]. Consequently, it may be possible that Carnoy's fixative can be used to microdissect tissues or cells tagged with a GFP marker.
Molecular integrity of Carnoy's-fixed LMM RNA was evaluated using qRT-PCR of five test transcripts. Amplification kinetics of five target transcripts using the four primer sets (Table 1) suggested that there was no systematic reduction of target mRNA in Carnoy's-fixed samples compared to the control (Figure 5). This suggests that LMM-prepared RNA from Carnoy's-fixed Ae. aegypti midgut tissues was as intact as the fresh frozen control RNA. The yields of RNA prepared by LMM were estimated to range between 0.3 - 19.0 ng (median of 18.4 ng) per batch of 10 - 15 sections from control, Bouin's, or Carnoy's-fixed midguts. Based on the requirement of 5 - 200 ng of total RNA for an Agilent microarray hybridization , the RNA yields obtained by LMM in the present study should be sufficient for the Agilent oligomicroarray experiments in Ae. aegypti if several batches of LMM-prepared RNA are pooled together as reported in helminth LMM/microarray studies . In addition, pooling RNA from several individual mosquitoes may have the advantage of normalizing genetic backgrounds that individual mosquitoes might have. In addition to the common histological fixatives tested in this study, fomalin-free commercial fixatives such as Molecular Fixative (Tissue-Tek, CA) and HOPE Fixative (Polysciences, PA) are available [24, 25]. These fixatives are reported to maintain the integrity of both nucleic acids and proteins in pathological samples. However, these commercial fixatives are expensive compared to Carnoy's, which can be prepared freshly and inexpensively in any laboratory. More importantly, the quality of Carnoy's-fixed LMM RNA from Ae. aegypti midguts was exceptionally high, and target mRNA was also successfully amplified in qRT-PCR assays. For protein studies, we have yet to test the suitability of Carnoy's-fixed proteins in immunological (e.g., ELISA and Western blotting) or other proteomic assays. Nevertheless, preparation of sufficient quantities of proteins for proteomic studies would involve substantial LMM isolation because unlike nucleic acids, proteins cannot be amplified post-isolation.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that tissue- or cell-specific isolation of Ae. aegypti RNA using LMM is feasible and that the RNA harvested using this method is of desirable quantity and quality for subsequent molecular assays. Development of this microdissection method should facilitate identification of candidate genes that play critical roles in infection mediation and pathogenesis of dengue virus in Ae. aegypti. This LMM method could be directly applicable to other major mosquito vectors such as Anopheles gambiae and Culex mosquitoes. Therefore, the utility of the LMM method is promising in vector biology research.
We appreciate the technical assistance with Bioanalyzer and cryosectioning by Dr. Melissa Burke and Clay Winterford, respectively (QIMR). The authors are also grateful to Dr. Ken Muneoka of Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Tulane University who provided access to a cryostat and Mark Rider of Tulane University for his critical reading of the manuscript. This work was partially supported by Tulane Research Enhancement Fund and NIH/NIAID fund (5R21AI076774) to Y.S.H.
- Nakazono M, Qiu F, Borsuk LA, Schnable PS: Laser-capture microdissection, a tool for the global analysis of gene expression in specific plant cell types: identification of genes expressed differentially in epidermal cells or vascular tissues of maize. Plant Cell. 2003, 15 (3): 583-596. 10.1105/tpc.008102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheng Y, Zhang J, Li Y, Wang Y, Gong J: Proteome analysis of human gastric cardia adenocarcinoma by laser capture microdissection. BMC Cancer. 2007, 7: 191. 10.1186/1471-2407-7-191.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinet W, Abbeloos V, Van Acker N, De Meyer GR, Herman AG, Kockx MM: Western blot analysis of a limited number of cells: a valuable adjunct to proteome analysis of paraffin wax-embedded, alcohol-fixed tissue after laser capture microdissection. J Pathol. 2004, 202 (3): 382-388. 10.1002/path.1525.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emmert-Buck MR, Bonner RF, Smith PD, Chuaqui RF, Zhuang Z, Goldstein SR, Weiss RA, Liotta LA: Laser capture microdissection. Science. 1996, 274 (5289): 998-1001. 10.1126/science.274.5289.998.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Espina V, Wulfkuhle JD, Calvert VS, VanMeter A, Zhou W, Coukos G, Geho DH, Petricoin EF, Liotta LA: Laser-capture microdissection. Nat Protoc. 2006, 1 (2): 586-603. 10.1038/nprot.2006.85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones MK, Higgins T, Stenzel DJ, Gobert GN: Towards tissue specific transcriptomics and expression pattern analysis in schistosomes using laser microdissection microscopy. Exp Parasitol. 2007, 117 (3): 259-266. 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.06.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones MK, Randall LM, McManus DP, Engwerda CR: Laser microdissection microscopy in parasitology: microscopes meet thermocyclers. Trends Parasitol. 2004, 20 (11): 502-506. 10.1016/j.pt.2004.08.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iyer EP, Cox DN: Laser capture microdissection of Drosophila peripheral neurons. J Vis Exp. 2010, pii: 2016, 39Google Scholar
- Hoopfer ED, Penton A, Watts RJ, Luo L: Genomic analysis of Drosophila neuronal remodeling: a role for the RNA-binding protein Boule as a negative regulator of axon pruning. J Neurosci. 2008, 28 (24): 6092-6103. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0677-08.2008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Biyasheva A, Svitkina T, Kunda P, Baum B, Borisy G: Cascade pathway of filopodia formation downstream of SCAR. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117 (Pt 6): 837-848.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vicidomini R, Tortoriello G, Furia M, Polese G: Laser microdissection applied to gene expression profiling of subset of cells from the Drosophila wing disc. J Vis Exp. 2010, pii: 1895, 38Google Scholar
- Murray GI: Laser Microdissection. Molecular Biomethods Handbook. Edited by: Walker J, Rapley R. 2008, Humana Press, 1027-1038. 2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Foss RD, Guha-Thakurta N, Conran RM, Gutman P: Effects of fixative and fixation time on the extraction and polymerase chain reaction amplification of RNA from paraffin-embedded tissue. Comparison of two housekeeping gene mRNA controls. Diagn Mol Pathol. 1994, 3 (3): 148-155. 10.1097/00019606-199409000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abrahamsen HN, Steiniche T, Nexo E, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Sorensen BS: Towards quantitative mRNA analysis in paraffin-embedded tissues using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: a methodological study on lymph nodes from melanoma patients. J Mol Diagn. 2003, 5 (1): 34-41. 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60449-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fields A: Diagnostic Virology Using Electron Microscopic Techniques. Advances in Virus Research. 1982, 27: 1-69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gerberg EJ: Manual for Mosquito Rearing and Experimental Techniques. AMCA Bulletin. Edited by: Collins D. 1970, Selma, California 93662: American Mosquito Control AssociationGoogle Scholar
- Gobert GN, McManus DP, Nawaratna S, Moertel L, Mulvenna J, Jones MK: Tissue specific profiling of females of Schistosoma japonicum by integrated laser microdissection microscopy and microarray analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009, 3 (6): e469. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000469.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rudin W, Hecker H: Functional morphology of the midgut of Aedes aegypti L. (Insecta, Diptera) during blood digestion. Cell Tissue Res. 1979, 200 (2): 193-203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hecker H: Structure and function of midgut epithelial cells in Culicidae mosquitoes (insecta, diptera). Cell Tissue Res. 1977, 184 (3): 321-341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brault AC, Foy BD, Myles KM, Kelly CL, Higgs S, Weaver SC, Olson KE, Miller BR, Powers AM: Infection patterns of o'nyong nyong virus in the malaria-transmitting mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol Biol. 2004, 13 (6): 625-635. 10.1111/j.0962-1075.2004.00521.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ito S, Gotoh E, Ozawa S, Yanagi K: Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen-1 is highly colocalized with interphase chromatin and its newly replicated regions in particular. J Gen Virol. 2002, 83 (Pt 10): 2377-2383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ward WW, Bokman SH: Reversible denaturation of Aequorea green-fluorescent protein: physical separation and characterization of the renatured protein. Biochemistry. 1982, 21 (19): 4535-4540. 10.1021/bi00262a003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agilent T: Two-Color Microarray-Based Gene Expression Analysis. Version 6.5. 2010Google Scholar
- Nadji M, Nassiri M, Vincek V, Kanhoush R, Morales AR: Immunohistochemistry of tissue prepared by a molecular-friendly fixation and processing system. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2005, 13 (3): 277-282. 10.1097/01.pai.0000146544.51771.79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vollmer E, Galle J, Lang DS, Loeschke S, Schultz H, Goldmann T: The HOPE technique opens up a multitude of new possibilities in pathology. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2006, 47 (1): 15-19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.