Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Changes in the immune system in experimental acanthamoebiasis in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed hosts

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 2 and
  • 1Email author
Parasites & Vectors201811:517

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3108-x

  • Received: 10 May 2018
  • Accepted: 11 September 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Acanthamoebiasis is most often found in patients with immune deficiency, with infections facilitated by the intake of immunosuppressive drugs. The host immune response to Acanthamoeba spp. infection is poorly understood. Thus, in this study, we aimed to examine the course of Acanthamoeba spp. infection taking into account the host’s immunological status, including assessment of the hematological parameters, cytokine analysis, immunophenotypic changes in spleen populations, and histological spleen changes, which could help clarify some aspects of the immune response to acanthamoebiasis. In our experimental study, we used Acanthamoeba strain AM 22 isolated from the bronchoaspirate of a patient with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and atypical pneumonia symptoms.

Results

Acanthamoeba spp. affected the hematological parameters in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed mice and induced a change in spleen weight during infection. Moreover, analysis of anti-inflammatory (IL-4 and IL-10) and pro-inflammatory (IL-17A and IFN-γ) cytokines produced by splenocytes stimulated with concanavalin A demonstrated that Acanthamoeba spp. induced a selective Th1, Th2 and Th17 response at later stages of the infection in immunocompetent hosts. In the case of hosts with low immunity, Acanthamoeba elicited robust Th1 cell-mediated immunity without the participation of Th17. We observed suppression of CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes and CD3+CD4-CD8- double-negative (DN) T lymphocyte populations in the beginning, and in the case of CD3+/CD4+/CD8+ double-positive (DP) T cells in the final phase of Acanthamoeba spp. infection in hosts with low immunity. Also, CD4+T lymphocytes and CD3+/CD4+ and CD3+/CD8+ lymphocyte counts during each stage of acanthamoebiasis were shown to be upregulated.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that analysis of the immune response and pathogenesis mechanisms of clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba spp. in an animal model not only has purely cognitive significance but above all, may help in the development of effective methods of pharmacological therapy especially in patients with low immunity.

Keywords

  • Acanthamoeba spp.
  • Immunological status
  • Immunophenotype

Background

Acanthamoebiasis is an opportunistic invasion caused by protozoans of the genus Acanthamoeba and is much more frequently noted in patients with immune deficiency, such as immunosuppressed patients following solid organ and bone marrow transplants and patients with HIV/AIDS [1]. Also, at risk are individuals with lymphoproliferative or hematologic disorders, diabetes mellitus, pneumonitis, renal failure, hepatic diseases, and gamma-globulinemia [13].

In immunosuppressed hosts, amoeba infections change the host-parasite relationships from oligosymptomatic and/or asymptomatic forms to acute disseminated parasitic infections affecting many organs, ultimately leading to the death of the host [4]. The widespread presence of Acanthamoeba makes them a significant threat to human health. After penetrating the central nervous system, lungs, cornea or human skin, they can cause granulomatous encephalitis (GAE), pneumonia (Acanthamoeba pneumonia), Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK), and cutaneous acanthamoebiasis (CA) [5, 6]. Several hundred cases of amoebic brain infections have been reported worldwide, with the first identified human case of GAE occurring in an immunosuppressed patient with Hodgkin’s disease [7]. The host immune response to Acanthamoeba spp. infection is poorly understood, even though 50–90% of people are known to be seropositive [8]. Immunocompetent patients are more likely to have brain invasions and secondary cutaneous lesions, while patients with low immunity more frequently have isolated primary cutaneous skin infections [9]. Immunocompetent patients develop a granulomatous reaction, while in immunosuppressed individuals, granuloma formation is weak, especially in HIV patients [10, 11].

Experimental and in vitro studies suggest the induction of innate and adaptive immune responses by Acanthamoeba spp., although there is a high discrepancy in the data [1, 12]. Brain Acanthamoeba spp. infection is a result of the host immune response and is most probably composed of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B lymphocytes, plasma cells and macrophages [2]. Deficiency in cell-mediated immunity is an important risk factor for GAE [13]. The factors that limit the activity of this protozoan parasite include neutrophils, macrophages and microglial cells. Moreover, their anti-parasitic effects are mediated in part by respiratory burst and nitric oxide under the influence of pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-1, TNF and/or IFN [1, 10, 14, 15]. An in vitro study by Cano et al. [12] showed that ocular Acanthamoeba keratitis induced the proinflammatory macrophage phenotype characterised by the production of IL-12 and IL-6. Little is known about the pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba pneumonia including the complexity of immunological mechanisms. We do know that these parasites cause inflammation, e.g. in the lungs, with the coexistence of primary lesions in other organs and systems. Here, we focused on the immune system in both immunocompetent and in immunosuppressed hosts as a suitable animal model to study acanthamoebiasis in humans. This is the first experimental model induced by Acanthamoeba spp. isolated from the bronchoaspirate of a patient with acute myeloid leukaemia with atypical pneumonia symptoms [5]. Previously, we observed that this strain (AM 22) was pneumophilic, which may affect the expression and activity of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), resulting in altered levels of their main products, prostaglandins (PGE2) and thromboxane B2 (TXB2), in the lungs of immunocompetent or immunosuppressed hosts [16]. Thus, in this study, we aimed to examine the course of Acanthamoeba spp. infection taking into account the host’s immunological status including assessment of the hematological parameters , cytokine analysis, immunophenotypic changes in spleen populations and histological spleen changes which could help clarify some aspects of the immune response to acanthamoebiasis.

Methods

Strain

The AM 22 strain isolated from bronchoaspirate of a 53-year-old male with acute septic shock was used in this study. The patient was in the blast crisis of acute myeloid leukemia and additionally was diagnosed with pneumonia. Based on analysis of a PCR-amplified 850 bp Ami fragment of 18S rRNA-gene the AM 22 strain was identified as Acanthamoeba genotype T16 [5]. Amoeba culture was grown on media with non-nutrient agar (NN Agar) coated with inactivated Escherichia coli bacteria, and incubated at 37 °C for 72 h. After the proliferation of Acanthamoeba, the trophozoites were washed with a sterile isotonic solution of 0.9% NaCl and prepared for intranasal inoculation of the test animals.

Animal model

Our experimental model of acanthamoebiasis involved BALB/c mice (n = 96) aged about 6–10 weeks, divided into four groups: (i) Group C: immunocompetent animals not infected with Acanthamoeba spp., (n = 18); (ii) Group A: immunocompetent animals infected with Acanthamoeba spp., (n = 30); (iii) Group CS: immunosuppressed animals not infected by Acanthamoeba spp.; immunosuppression induced by methylprednisolone (MPS) (n = 18); and (iv) Group AS: immunosuppressed animals infected by Acanthamoeba spp.; immunosuppression induced by MPS (n = 30).

For four days (-4, -3, -2, -1, 0) AS and CS animals were intraperitoneally administered 0.22 mg MPS (10 mg/kg) (Solu-Medrol, Pfizer, Puurs, Belgium, Europe MA EEIG), a steroid with immunosuppressive properties according to the methodology described by Markovitz et al. [17]. Such an algorithm made it possible to create an experimental model of tests under in vivo conditions, similar to patients with a reduced level of immunity. MPS is used in the treatment of acute organ rejection episodes. Animals from groups A and AS were given 3 μl of a suspension of Acanthamoeba trophozoites containing 10–20 thousand of the amoebae counted in Bürker chamber, intranasally. Mice from the C and CS groups received 3 μl of 0.9% NaCl intranasally. The animals were dissected at 8, 16 and 24 days after infection (dpi), depending on the onset of symptoms after intraperitoneal administration of sodium pentobarbital (2 ml/kg) (Euthasol vet, FATRO, Raamsdonksveer, The Netherlands). During the dissection, tissues and organs (including the spleen) were collected for immunological and histological analysis and adequately secured. The collected spleens were weighed.

Laboratory blood test

Whole blood from the heart of the mice was sampled using the 1.2 ml blood collection system S Monovette (SARSTEDT AG&Co, Nümbrecht, Germany) containing K3EDTA as an anticoagulant. The study was carried out at the Clinical Central Laboratory in Szczecin. By means of a laser hematology analyzer, Sysmex XS-800i (Sysmex-Europe, Norderstedt, Germany), 11 parameters were measured in each sample: white blood cell count (WBC), number and percentage of lymphocytes (LYM), number and percentage of neutrophils (NEU), number and percentage of monocytes (MONO), number and percentage of eosinophils (EOS), number and percentage of basophils (BASO), red blood cell count (RBC), haemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), and platelet count (PLT), as described by Kosik-Bogacka et al. [18].

Flow cytometric immunophenotyping

Immunophenotypic analysis of splenocytes by flow cytometry was undertaken as described by Kabat-Koperska et al. [19], and this test was only performed for immunosuppressed animals, including AS and CS groups. Spleens were collected during the section of the animals, then placed in Hank’s 1× balanced salt solutions, cut into pieces, pressed through nylon to sterile Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA ) containing phenol red and L-glutamine. The liquid was transferred to a centrifuge tube containing the same volume of RPMI 1640 medium, then centrifuged (2000× g for 20 min at room temperature). The middle cloud layer was placed in lymphocytes isolation medium and centrifuged (1000× g for 10 min at room temperature). The following monoclonal antibodies were used (mAb): PE Hamster Anti-Mouse CD3e (Clone 145-2C11), FITC Rat Anti-Mouse CD4 (Clone RM4-5), APC Rat Anti-Mouse CD8a (Clone 53-6.7) (BD Biosciences,San Jose, USA). Samples were subjected to acquisition using an LRS II flow cytometer (Becton Dickinsson, San Jose, CA, USA) and FacsDiva version 6.2 software (BD Biosciences). Appropriate isotype antibodies were used as controls (FITC Rat IgG2a κ Isotype Control, PE Hamster IgG1 κ Isotype Control, APC Rat IgG2a κ Isotype Control) (BD Biosciences). Typically, 30,000 events were acquired to determine the percentage of the examined sub-population within the spleen cell population. Analysis of sub-populations of lymphocytes in the spleen was based on the presence of CD3, CD4, and CD8 antigens on the cell surface (Fig. 1).

Cytokine assays

Cell suspensions at a density of 2 × 106 lymphocytes were placed in wells, 0.5 ml of cell suspension in 1 ml of incubation medium: RPMI, 10% bovine serum, 50 μg/ml of gentamycin and increasing amounts of concanavalin A (ConA, 0 μg/ml; 5 μg/ml) we estimated the functional response to this mitogen [19]. Incubation of lymphocytes in the well plates was carried out at 37 °C for 72 h under an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After incubation, the cell suspensions were centrifuged at 1000× g for 10 min. The concentrations of cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, IL-17, INF-γ) were determined in the culture supernatants using enzyme-linked immunoassays according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (BD Biosciences, BD OptEIA Set Mouse IL-4, IL-10, INF-γ for IL-4, IL-10, INF-γ, respectively; IL-17A [homodimer] ELISA Ready-SET-GO for IL-17 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Results for each cytokine were expressed in μg/ml. Standard curves were derived from the cytokine standards supplied with the kit.

Histology spleen examination

Spleen tissues were fixed in 10% formalin for at least 24 h and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin slides (3 μm) of the mice spleen were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, and a general histological examination was undertaken.

Statistical analysis

The analysis used Statistica 10.0 software (StatSoft). The arithmetic means (AM), standard deviations of the AM (SD), and medians (Med) were calculated for each studied group. In order to determine compliance with the expected normal distribution of results, a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with Lilliefors correction (P < 0.05) was used. Non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-test) were used as data deviated from a normal distribution. Differences between groups were analysed with the Mann-Whitney U-test for comparison of 2 groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison of 4 groups. The significance level was P < 0.05.

Results

Spleen weight

We observed a significantly lower total spleen weight in the Acanthamoeba spp. infected groups (immunocompetent and immunosuppressed) compared to control groups (C and CS) (Table 1). The weight of the spleen at 8 dpi was significantly lower in the group A than in the control (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 30, P = 0.05), also at 16 dpi lower in the group A than in the group C (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 41, P = 0.02) and lower in the group AS than in the group CS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 42.5, P = 0.02). At 24 dpi we observed significant differences between infected groups with different immunological status (A vs AS, Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 72, P = 0.02) (Table 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

An example of a gating strategy used to identify sub-populations of T lymphocytes in the spleen using antigens CD3, CD4, CD8. Dot-plots show spleen cell gating on the side scatter (SSC) and forward scatter (FSC) (gate P1). Events contained by gate P2 were characterised by the presence on the surface of the CD3 antigen (CD3+ lymphocytes). Cells positive for the CD3 marker were further divided based on their expression of CD4 and CD8 antigen. Sub-populations of lymphocytes such as CD3+ (P2), CD3+/CD4+ (quadrant Q2+Q4), CD3+/CD8+ (Q1+Q2), CD3+/CD4+/CD8+ (Q2), CD3+/CD4-/CD8- (Q3) were analysed using this strategy

Table 1

Spleen weight (g) of male mice in control and Acanthamoeba spp. infected groups after 8, 16 and 24 days post-infection (dpi)

Parameter/group

Group A

(n = 10)

Group C

(n = 6)

Group AS

(n = 10)

Group CS

(n = 6)

Kruskal-Wallis test

Total spleen weight

AM ± SD

0.06 ± 0.03a

0.07 ± 0.008a

0.08 ± 0.06b

0.10 ± 0.01b

H = 29.81, df = 2, P = 0.001

Median

0.07

0.07

0.1

0.1

Range

0.02–0.15

0.06–0.09

0.01–0.20

0.1–0.15

8 dpi

AM ± SD

0.05 ± 0.02c

0.07 ± 0.01c

0.11 ± 0.04

0.10 ± 0.02

H = 22.78, df = 3, P = 0.001

Median

0.06

0.07

0.10

0.10

Range

0.03– 0.07

0.06–0.08

0.1–0.2

0.1–0.15

16 dpi

AM ± SD

0.05 ± 0.02d

0.07 ± 0.01d

0.04 ± 0.06e

0.10 ± 0.0e

H = 15.36, df = 3, P = 0.01

Median

0.06

0.07

0.01

0.10

Range

0.02–0.07

0.06–0.08

0.01–0.20

0.10–0.10

24 dpi

AM ± SD

0.08 ± 0.03f

0.08 ± 0.01

0.09 ± 0.03f

0.10 ± 0.0

H = 13.79, df = 3, P = 0.01

Median

0.08

0.08

0.10

0.10

Range

0.05–0.15

0.07–0.09

0.01–0.10

0.10–0.10

aP ≤ 0.03 for the significance of difference A vs C (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 311),

bP ≤ 0.04 for the significance of difference AS vs CS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 297)

cP ≤ 0.05 for the significance of difference A vs C (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 30)

dP ≤ 0.02 for the significance of difference A vs C (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 41)

eP ≤ 0.02 for the significance of difference AS vs CS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 42.5)

fP ≤ 0.02 for the significance of difference A vs AS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 72)

Abbreviations: Group A, immunocompetent infected group; Group C, immunocompetent control group; Group AS immunosuppressed infected group; Group CS, immunosuppressed non-infected group; AM, arithmetic mean; SD, standard deviation

Haematology results

We noted statistically significant differences in examined basic hematological parameters between control groups (C and CS) and Acanthamoeba spp.-infected immunocompetent mice (A) and infected mice with low immunity (AS) (Table 2). We observed higher lymphocyte count in the group AS than in the group CS (0.92 G/l vs 0.65 G/l, Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 78, P = 0.01). There were significantly lower monocyte counts in the group A than in the group AS (0.11 G/l vs 0.36 G/l, Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 51, P = 0.02) and higher in the group AS than in the group CS (0.36 G/l vs 0.06 G/l, Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 57.5, P = 0.03). The basophile count was significantly higher in the group AS, than in the group CS (0.23 G/l vs 0.05 G/l, Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 76, P = 0.01). We found higher platelet count in the group A than in the group C (633.3 G/l vs 481.4 G/l, Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 52, P = 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2

Hematology results of Acanthamoeba spp. infected immunocompetent, immunosuppressed and control groups

Parameter/group

Group A

(n = 10)

Group C

(n = 10)

Group AS

(n = 10)

Group CS

(n = 10)

Kruskal-Wallis test

WBC (G/l)

AM ± SD

1.83 ± 0.55

1.38 ± 0.33

1.57 ± 0.85

1.92 ± 1.05

H = 2.03, df = 3, P = 0.57

Median

1.89

1.27

1.53

1.89

Range

1.14–2.74

1.12–1.85

0.63–3.41

0.40–3.60

LYM (G/l)

AM ± SD

1.11 ± 0.27

1.11 ± 0.25

0.92 ± 0.56a

0.65 ± 0.38a

H = 12.04, df = 3, P = 0.04

Median

1.08

1.05

0.84

0.55

Range

0.78–1.51

0.89–1.47

0.00–1.68

0.32–1.08

NEU (G/l)

AM ± SD

0.01 ± 0.01

0.02 ± 0.01

0.03 ± 0.07

0.01 ± 0.01

H = 3.32, df = 3, P = 0.47

Median

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

Range

0.00–0.01

0.00–0.02

0.00–0.24

0.00–0.02

MONO (G/l)

AM ± SD

0.11 ± 0.12b

0.08 ± 0.13

0.36 ± 0.87b,c

0.06 ± 0.10c

H = 6.48, df = 3, P = 0.02

Median

0.04

0.02

0.05

0.05

Range

0.01–0.27

0.00–0.27

0.00–2.80

0.00–0.30

EOS (G/l)

AM ± SD

0.02 ± 0.01

 

0.06 ± 0.19

0.17 ± 0.28

H = 0.71, df = 3, P = 0.86

Median

0.01

 

0.03

0.01

Range

0.00–0.02

0

0.01–0.60

0.01–0.50

BASO (G/l)

AM ± SD

0.27 ± 0.13

0.13 ± 0.07

0.23 ± 0.17d

0.05 ± 0.08d

H = 7.75, df = 3, P = 0.01

Median

0.23

0.13

0.24

0.02

Range

0.14–0.49

0.09–0.49

0.01–0.61

0.01–0.20

RBC (T/l)

AM ± SD

9.30 ± 0.37

9.64 ± 0.10

9.18 ± 0.42

8.47±3.19

H = 4.41, df = 3, P = 0.22

Median

9.34

9.62

9.24

9.59

Range

8.7–9.7

9.5–9.8

8.3–9.68

9.02–10.1

HGB (mmol/l)

AM ± SD

9.01 ± 0.34

9.37 ± 0.15

8.91 ± 0.33

9.16 ± 0.30

H = 4.92, df = 3, P = 0.17

Median

9.0

9.04

9.0

9.27

Range

8.6–9.6

9.2–9.5

8.30–9.2

8.70–9.6

HCT (L/l)

AM ± SD

0.41 ± 0.009

0.43 ± 0.01

0.41 ± 0.02

0.42 ± 0.01

H = 2.02, df = 3, P = 0.57

Median

0.41

0.43

0.41

0.41

Range

0.40–0.43

0.41–0.43

0.38–0.43

0.40–0.43

PLT (G/l)

AM ± SD

633.3 ± 176.6e

481.4 ± 277.6e

866.8 ± 60.3

912.0 ± 109.3

H = 4.60, df = 3, P = 0.02

Median

646.5

355.0

889.5

880.0

Range

432.0–932.0

204.0–808.0

746.0–950.0

803.0–1120.0

aP ≤ 0.01 for the significance of difference AS vs CS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 78)

bP ≤ 0.02 for the significance of difference A vs AS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 51)

cP ≤ 0.03 for the significance of difference AS vs CS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 57.5)

dP ≤ 0.01 for the significance of difference AS vs CS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 76)

eP ≤ 0.05 for the significance of difference A vs C (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 52)

Abbreviations: Group A, immunocompetent infected group; Group C, immunocompetent control group; Group AS immunosuppressed infected group; Group CS, immunosuppressed non-infected group; G, giga; AM, arithmetic mean; SD, standard deviation

Cytokine assays

Analysis of cytokine profile after incubation of the lymphocytes from the spleen with increasing doses of concanavalin A (ConA) (0 and 5 μg/ml) found higher level of IL-4 (anti-inflammatory cytokine) after administration of a higher dose of ConA (5 μg/ml) at 16 dpi in the group A compared to AS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 22.5, P = 0.02). We observed an increased level of IL-10 (anti-inflammatory cytokine) with a higher dose of Con A in both infected groups (A and AS) at 16 dpi (Mann-Whitney U-test; group A vs C: U = 22, P = 0.05; AS vs CS: U = 25, P = 0.01; A vs AS: U = 16, P = 0.01). There were significantly higher levels of IL-17A (proinflammatory cytokine) with a higher dose of Con A at 16 dpi in group A compared to group C (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 22.5, P = 0.02) and with a lower dose of ConA at 24 dpi in group A vs C (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 13.5, P = 0.05). We noted decreased level of IFN-γ (proinflammatory cytokine) with a higher dose of ConA in infected immunocompetent group (A) compared to infected immunosuppressed group (AS) at 24 dpi (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 11, P = 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3

Cytokine profile after incubation of lymphocytes from the spleen with different doses of concanavalin A, ConA (0 μg/ml; 5 μg/ml)

Parameter/group

 

Group A

(n = 10)

Group C

(n = 6)

Group AS

(n = 10)

Group CS

(n = 6)

Kruskal-Wallis test

IL-4

 8 dpi

ConA0

0

0

0

0

P = 1.0

ConA5

0.52 ± 4.33

0.26 ± 0.59

0

0

H = 2.16, df = 3, P = 0.54

 16 dpi

ConA0

0

0

0

1.94 ± 4.33

H = 3.18, df = 3, P = 0.39

ConA5

50.35 ± 51.75a

0

0a

0

H = 11.22, df = 3, P = 0.002

 24 dpi

ConA0

0

0

1.28 ± 2.86

0

H = 3.00, df = 3, P = 0.31

ConA5

1.19 ± 2.67

0.66 ± 1.47

0

0

H = 21.00, df = 3, P = 0.54

IL-10

 8 dpi

ConA0

84.63 ± 46.72

149.98 ± 128.88

83.06 ± 37.32

58.90 ± 26.14

H = 3.94, df = 3, P = 0.27

ConA5

168.43 ± 180.88

212.92 ± 180.20

139.47 ± 125.42

86.16 ± 12.56

H = 4.07, df = 3, P = 0.25

 16 dpi

ConA0

128.27 ± 65.83

78.98 ± 58.82

78.60 ± 46.47

69.07 ± 15.19

H = 4.62, df = 3, P = 0.34

ConA5

511.09 ± 40.41b, c

67.42 ± 16.98b

276.18 ± 224.72c,d

81.01 ± 19.34d

H = 10.30, df = 3, P = 0.01

 24 dpi

ConA0

14.94 ± 33.40

19.99 ± 99.96

0

0

H = 2.16, df = 3, P = 0.55

ConA5

82.13 ± 82.73

36.54 ± 74.12

0

230.67 ± 515.76

H = 3.73, df = 3, P = 0.29

IL-17 A

 8 dpi

ConA0

0

0

0

0

P = 1.0

ConA5

13.86 ± 30.98

0

0

0

H = 3.00, df = 3, P = 0.39

 16 dpi

ConA0

0

0

0

0.75 ± 1.68

H = 4.00, df = 3, P = 0.56

ConA5

78.60 ± 55.28e

0e

0

5.24 ± 7.29

H = 11.22, df = 3, P = 0.01

 24 dpi

ConA0

9.97 ± 13.97f

2.05 ± 1.54f

0

0

H = 8.44, df = 3, P = 0.04

ConA5

13.27 ± 16.80

1.81 ± 2.06

32.85 ± 37.08

38.77 ± 52.46

H = 2.60, df = 3, P = 0.45

IFN-γ

 8 dpi

ConA0

0

0

0

0

P = 1

ConA5

0

0

0

0

P = 1

 16 dpi

ConA0

0

24.0 ± 53.66

0

0

H = 3.00, df = 3, P = 0.39

ConA5

0

0

0

0

P = 1

 24 dpi

ConA0

0

0

0

0

P = 1

ConA5

594.21 ± 772.32g

0

939.29 ± 768.24g

546.31 ± 738.50

H = 8.80, df = 3, P = 0.03

aP ≤ 0.02 for the significance of difference A vs AS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 22.5)

bP ≤ 0.05 for the significance of difference A vs C (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 22)

cP ≤ 0.01 for the significance of difference A vs AS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 16)

dP ≤ 0.01 for the significance of difference AS vs CS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 25)

eP ≤ 0.02 for the significance of difference A vs C (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 22.5)

fP ≤ 0.05 for the significance of difference A vs C (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 13.5)

gP ≤ 0.05 for the significance of difference A vs AS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 11)

Abbreviations: Group A, immunocompetent infected group; Group C, immunocompetent control group; Group AS immunosuppressed infected group; Group CS, immunosuppressed non-infected group; AM, arithmetic mean; SD, standard deviation

Immunophenotyping results

Immunophenotyping analysis of splenocytes by flow cytometry was only performed for immunosuppressed animals including AS and CS groups. After splenocytes flow cytometry analysis we observed increased CD3+/CD4+ lymphocyte counts in the group AS at 24 dpi (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 21, P = 0.05) and increased CD3+/CD8+ lymphocyte counts in the group AS at 16 dpi (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 25, P = 0.01). We noted decreased populations of double negative cells (CD3+/CD4-/CD8-) at 8 dpi in the group AS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 24, P = 0.02) and increased populations of double positive cells (CD3+/CD4+/CD8+) at 24 dpi in the group AS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 19, P = 0.03) (Table 4). In addition, the percentage of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, the CD4+ / CD8+ cell ratio and the CD4-/CD8- cell population ratio were determined. We observed decreased CD3+ lymphocyte counts in Acanthamoeba spp.-infected groups at 8 dpi (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 23, P = 0.04), but increased at 24 dpi (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 22, P = 0.05). We noted increased CD4+ (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 25, P = 0.01) and decreased CD8+ lymphocyte counts (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 25, P = 0.05) in the group AS at 8 dpi. There was significantly lower CD4-/CD8- lymphocyte ratio counts in the group AS compared with the group CS (Mann-Whitney U-test, U = 22, P = 0.05) at 8 dpi (Table 5).
Table 4

Immunophenotyping results in % (spleen) of Acanthamoeba spp.-infected immunosuppressed mice and control mice with low immunity

Parameter/group

  

Group AS

(n = 10)

Group CS

(n = 6)

Mann-Whitney U-test

CD3+/CD4+ (T lymphocytes) (%)

8 dpi

AM ± SD

22.67 ± 0.13

24.47 ± 0.09

U = 16, P = 0.53

Median

22.87

25.57

Range

18.62–26.69

21.51–26.73

16 dpi

AM ± SD

28.87 ± 0.05

27.51 ± 0.20

U = 15, P = 0.09

Median

25.09

25.78

Range

23.11–26.19

22.27–36.82

24 dpi

AM ± SD

25.17 ± 0.43

16.68 ± 0.18

U = 21, P = 0.05

Median

22.17

17.35

Range

14.67–43.74

12.04–20.34

CD3+/CD8+ (%)

8 dpi

AM ± SD

5.25 ± 0.14

6.16 ± 0.37

U = 14, P = 0.83

Median

5.21

6.03

Range

4.44–6.28

4.23–9.89

16 dpi

AM ± SD

7.40 ± 0.05

4.55 ± 0.24

U = 25, P = 0.01

Median

7.51

4.19

Range

6.83–7.94

3.39–6.36

24 dpi

AM ± SD

4.23 ± 0.60

4.10 ± 0.17

U = 19, P = 0.21

Median

5.54

3.83

Range

0.05–7.45

3.35–5.16

CD3+/CD4+/CD8+ (DP %)

8 dpi

AM ± SD

1.13 ± 0.19

1.82 ± 0.29

U = 21, P = 0.09

Median

1.18

1.87

Range

0.83–1.35

0.96–2.36

16 dpi

AM ± SD

1.52 ± 0.24

1.61 ± 0.38

U = 13, P = 0.99

Median

1.66

1.61

Range

0.98–1.94

1.17–2.6

24 dpi

AM ± SD

2.71 ± 0.89

1.32 ± 0.35

U = 19, P = 0.03

Median

1.63

1.07

Range

1.1–7.47

0.96–2.03

CD3+/CD4-/CD8- (DN %)

8 dpi

AM ± SD

0.12 ± 0.21

0.21 ± 0.18

U = 24, P = 0.02

Median

0.12

0.23

Range

0.1–0.16

0.16–0.24

16 dpi

AM ± SD

0.14 ± 0.10

0.09 ± 0.65

U = 20, P = 0.14

Median

0.14

0.09

Range

0.11–0.17

0.03–0.18

24 dpi

AM ± SD

0.16 ± 0.59

0.11 ± 0.26

U = 19, P = 0.15

Median

0.22

0.11

Range

0.004–0.24

0.07–0.13

Abbreviations: Group A, immunocompetent infected group; Group C, immunocompetent control group; Group AS immunosuppressed infected group; Group CS, immunosuppressed non-infected group; AM, arithmetic mean; SD, standard deviation DP, CD3+/CD4+/CD8+ double-positive T cells; DN, CD3+CD4−CD8− double-positive T cells

Table 5

The percentage of T lymphocyte sub-populations in the spleen of Acanthamoeba spp.-infected immunosuppressed mice and control mice with low immunity

Parameter/group

  

Group AS

(n = 10)

Group CS

(n = 6)

Mann-Whitney U-test

CD3+ (T lymphocytes)%

8 dpi

AM ± SD

29.21 ± 3.23

33.99 ± 2.60

U = 23, P = 0.04

Median

29.78

34.63

Range

24.75–33.23

30.94–36.46

16 dpi

AM ± SD

32.77 ± 1.62

36.07 ± 7.97

U = 14, P = 0.83

Median

33.03

33.63

Range

30.08–34.27

28.83–49.13

24 dpi

AM ± SD

31.65 ± 11.57

22.96 ± 3.10

U = 22, P = 0.05

Median

28.23

22.73

Range

21.76–51.73

19.78–26.09

CD4+ %

8 dpi

AM ± SD

77.37 ± 1.17

70.74 ± 1.67

U = 25, P = 0.01

Median

77.24

70.59

Range

74.98–79.46

68.14–73.33

16 dpi

AM ± SD

74.91 ± 1.56

77.40 ± 1.43

U = 22, P = 0.06

Median

75.60

77.36

Range

72.70–76.26

75.27–78.73

24 dpi

AM ± SD

72.14 ± 6.06

76.55 ± 5.98

U = 21, P = 0.14

Median

74.18

78.70

Range

62.53–78.17

66.38–81.85

CD8+ %

8 dpi

AM ± SD

17.74 ± 1.39

21.80 ± 0.57

U = 25, P = 0.01

Median

17.14

21.58

Range

16.14–19.47

21.16–22.62

16 dpi

AM ± SD

14.31 ± 8.43

16.86 ± 2.67

U = 13, P = 0.99

Median

16.72

16.40

Range

0.15–22.62

13.85–20.15

24 dpi

AM ± SD

14.98 ± 2.60

17.89 ± 1.19

U = 21, P = 0.09

Median

14.64

17.37

Range

12.23–18.69

16.93–19.75

CD4-/CD8- %

8 dpi

AM ± SD

3.70 ± 0.87

5.69 ± 1.60

U = 22, P = 0.05

Median

3.67

6.10

Range

2.62–4.90

3.29–7.18

16 dpi

AM ± SD

9.27 ± 8.06

4.10 ± 1.22

U = 21, P = 0.09

Median

6.67

4.48

Range

4.02–23.5

2.45–5.54

24 dpi

AM ± SD

7.22 ± 3.61

5.97 ± 2.54

U = 17, P = 0.41

Median

6.20

4.93

Range

4.13–13.45

3.81–10.3

CD4+/CD8+ %

8 dpi

AM ± SD

0.43 ± 0.06

0.43 ± 0.09

U = 14, P = 0.83

Median

0.41

0.38

Range

0.36–0.52

0.38–0.61

16 dpi

AM ± SD

0.52 ± 0.29

0.57 ± 0.13

U = 12, P = 0.99

Median

0.65

0.58

Range

0.01–0.70

0.38–0.72

24 dpi

AM ± SD

0.34 ± 0.09

0.48 ± 0.15

U = 19, P = 0.21

Median

0.38

0.44

Range

0.21–0.42

0.29–0.67

Abbreviations: Group A, immunocompetent infected group; Group C, immunocompetent control group; Group AS immunosuppressed infected group; Group CS, immunosuppressed non-infected group; AM, arithmetic mean; SD, standard deviation

Histology of the spleen

Figure 2a shows a typical representative histological image of a control mice spleen, with white pulp (WP) consisting of lymphatic nodules with a central artery envelope by PALS, and red pulp (RP) containing venous sinuses and splenic cords. Histology of the spleen after immunosuppressive treatment (Fig. 2b) did not change significantly, although the marginal zone (MZ) was more evident and thicker than in control animals (Fig. 2a). The number and size of lymphatic nodules and structure of the red pulp were very close to that observed in the control mice (Fig. 2a, b). The organs from groups C and CS were compact and enveloped by a thin connective tissue capsule that sent very delicate septa into the spleen parenchyma. After Acanthamoeba spp. infection (Fig. 3a-f), the observed splenomegaly corresponded with looseness and fragility of the splenic parenchyma. At the beginning of the second week of infection (8 dpi), both in suppressant-treated and control mice (Fig. 3a, d) hyperplasia of the white pulp was observed, and the follicular structure was distorted. In both groups of infected animals (A, AS) the subcapsular area was loose or highly lymphoid infiltrated (yellow or white asterisks, respectively); in the red pulp of these mice, many lymphocytes also occurred. The histological image of the spleen and morphometric measurements showed a decrease in WP/RP ratio at 16 dpi and an increase at 24 dpi in Acanthamoeba spp. infection (Fig. 3c, e and d, f, respectively). In the amoeba infected and immunosuppressed mice the marginal zone was also more evident (Fig. 3b, c, e, f) than in the control mice (Fig. 2a), which could suggest an increase in the number of unique subset of non-circulating IgM+/IgD− B-cells of the marginal zone, opposite to IgM+/IgD+ follicular B-cells [20].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Morphology of control immunocompetent (a) and immunosuppressed (b) mice spleen. Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Abbreviations: WP, white pulp; RP, red pulp; MZ, marginal zone. Magnification of ×50. Scale-bars: 200 μm

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Representative microphotographs showing spleen histological morphology of mice infected by Acanthamoeba spp. from immunocompetent (a-c) and (d-f) with immunosuppressant treatment after 8 (a, d), 16 (b, e) and 24 (c, f) days post-infection. Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Abbreviations: WP, white pulp; RP, red pulp; MZ, marginal zone. Yellow and white asterisks indicate subcapsular loose or lymphoid infiltrated area. Magnification of ×50. Scale-bars: 200 μm

Discussion

The course, pathogenesis and clinical picture of a free-living Acanthamoeba infection is unclear in both immunocompetent and immunosuppressed hosts. In this experimental model, we assessed the impact of the clinical strain AM 22 of Acanthamoeba spp. isolated from a patient with low immunity and with atypical pneumonia symptoms, on changes in the immune system in mice depending on the host’s immune status. Immunosuppression at both humoral or cellular levels had different consequences for the host depending on the magnitude and may alter the range of parasites to which the host is susceptible [4].

We noticed a reduction in total spleen mass in Acanthamoeba spp.-infected groups (with normal and low immunity) compared to control mice. When analysing acanthamoebiasis during the period of infection, the spleen mass was greater in immunocompetent Acanthamoeba spp. infected mice at 24 dpi and the weight of this organ decreased at 16 dpi in immunosuppressed infected mice. Likewise, Machado et al. [21], in a Leishmania chagasi experimental model, observed a decrease in spleen weight in steroid-immunosuppressed mice. The change in mass of organs located in the peritoneal cavity is one of the indicators of the intensity of peritonitis and may also result from increased cell proliferation [22]. In protozoan parasites, e.g. Plasmodium spp., Trypanosoma spp., Leishmania spp., and Cryptosporidium parvum infections, splenomegaly is usually observed, and splenic tissue is a good indicator of immunological activity and parasitic infection in mammals [23]. Gornik & Kuźna-Grygiel [24], in experimental studies on the infection of Acanthamoeba spp., observed that the spleen of the infected mice did not differ from the control in the macroscopic view, which coincides with our results. Moreover, in Acanthamoeba spp. infected spleens, hyperplasia of the white pulp around the arteriolae was found [24].

Knowledge of haematological parameters in mice experimentally infected with Acanthamoeba spp. is extremely limited, while in patients with brain, lung, or peritonitis, Acanthamoeba spp. infections are very diverse. We observed higher lymphocyte and basophile counts in Acanthamoeba spp. infected immunosuppressed mice than in the control. Moreover, monocyte levels were lower in Acanthamoeba spp. infected immunocompetent mice than in infected animals with low immunity. Free-living amoeba also induced an increase in platelet count in infected immunocompetent hosts. Data from a previous clinical study showed a reduction in platelets and lymphocytes in a patient with low immunity and Acanthamoeba pneumonia [25]. In patients with GAE, there was anaemia, upregulation of leukocytes, stable level of lymphocytes and increased or stable level of platelets [13, 26].

In the early phase of inflammation, phagocytes produce pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-8, IL-17 and IFN-γ that can initiate, exacerbate, and maintain the inflammatory process [27]. Antagonistic groups are anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-4, produced by Th2 cells that may inhibit the inflammatory process. The roles of IL-4, IL-10, IL-17 and IFN-γ, in Acanthamoeba spp. pathogenesis are poorly documented. Interleukin-4 is involved in allergic and autoimmune processes [28]. IL-10 acts as an inhibitor of the immune response, blocking the production of Th1-stimulated lymphocytes and stopping the production of inflammatory cytokines, such as IFN-γ, as well as inhibiting IL-4 production by Th2 cells [29, 30]. Many studies on pathogenic protozoa indicate that intracellular Leishmania spp., Plasmodium spp., and Trypanosoma cruzi trigger IL-10, but mechanisms involved in this immune event are still unclear [3133]. Mattana et al. [34] observed that Acanthamoeba trophozoites could induce the production of IL-10 by human mononuclear cells in vitro. In this study, we noticed that IL-4 and IL-10 was significantly downregulated in the Acanthamoeba spp. infected immunosuppressed mice vs immunocompetent infected mice at 16 dpi following higher doses of ConA. The host’s immune system may have induced secretion of IL-10 in this study as a response to the infection by Acanthamoeba spp. Moreover, we found relatively low levels of IL-4 after administration of different doses of ConA except at 16 dpi and in immunocompetent infected mice. In Acanthamoeba keratitis, Suryawanshi et al. [35] found an increased production of IL-4, IFN-γ and IL-17A and suggested induction of Th1, Th2, and Th17 cell response in the cornea infection.

Interleukin-17A plays a key role in anti-microbial and anti-fungal defence by inducing cytokines, chemokines that affect neutrophil activation [36, 37]. Some studies have demonstrated that IL-17 cells mediate host defences against Chagas disease, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, alveolar disease and opportunistic infections such as pneumocystosis, toxoplasmosis and cryptosporidiosis [3842]. IL-17 is also involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases and transplant rejection reactions of organs [37]. Suryawanshi et al. [35] suggested that IL-17A production after Acanthamoeba spp. infection plays an important role in host protection against invading parasites in the human cornea (during Acanthamoeba keratitis), although it is not known how it acts as a mediator of systemic inflammatory response, e.g. in amoebic brain and lung infections, and it is not known whether this cytokine participates as a defense mechanism or in the pathogenesis of these diseases. In connection with the multidirectional action of IL-17, it may play a superior role in the cytokine network that regulates immune and inflammatory reactions [39]. In this study, we observed significant expression of IL-17A in Acanthamoeba spp. infected immunocompetent mice compared to control at 16 dpi and there was significant upregulation of this proinflammatory interleukin in the infected mice with low immunity compared to infected immunocompetent hosts after administration of higher doses of ConA. Moreover, the level of IL-17A significantly differed in infected immunocompetent animals vs control mice at 24 dpi.

IFN-γ is a pro-inflammatory cytokine secreted primarily by T and natural killer (NK) cells, playing the role of an inducer of adaptive immune responses against protozoan infections [43]. We noticed that IFN-γ was blocked at 8 dpi and 16 dpi in all study groups regardless of the immune status of the host. On day 24 post-infection, we observed that the Acanthamoeba spp. infected immunosuppressed mice produced significantly more IFN-γ than infected immunocompetent hosts, as in previous studies on the invasion of Blastocystis spp. [44].

Type 1 and 2 cytokines are cross-regulatory groups [45]. Type 1 cytokines (including IFN-γ) favour the development of a strong cellular immune response during parasitic infection whereas type 2 cytokines favour a strong humoral immune response, so IL-4 and IL-10 may decrease the concentration of type 1 cytokines including IFN-γ, which was observed in Acanthamoeba spp. infection in hosts with normal and low immunity.

Animal models have demonstrated that T cell response seemed to be crucial for parasite control [46]. Flow cytometry analysis from the spleen of Acanthamoeba spp. infected immunosuppressed mice showed the upregulation of CD3+/CD4+ T cells [%] from the level of the control at 24 dpi. Moreover, in the AS group, we found a significant increase in CD3+/CD8+ T cells (%) at 16 dpi. CD3+CD4-CD8- double-negative (DN) T cells play a key role in regulating the immune responses in transplant rejection, function in graft-versus-host disease, autoimmune diseases and also infectious diseases including parasitic infection [47, 48]. DN T cells have a regulatory function similar to regulatory T cells (Tregs) and secrete CD4-like cytokines including IL-4, IL-17, IFN-γ to exert their T helper function [49]. Liang et al. [50] in HIV positive patients observed that the decrease in DN T cells was correlated with a rapid disease progression. Data from our study shows downregulation of CD3+/CD4-/CD8- T cells (%) in Acanthamoeba spp. infected immunosuppressed mice compared to the control at the beginning of infection. CD3+/CD4+/CD8+ double-positive (DP) T cells have been reported in healthy subjects as well as in patients with autoimmune and chronic infectious diseases [51]. Not much is known about their participation in parasitic invasions but in the Acanthamoeba spp. infected host with low immunity there was an upward trend in the number of DP T cells during the invasion and also a significantly higher DP T cell count in the AS group compared to 24 dpi.

CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T lymphocytes and CD4+/CD8+ and CD4-/CD8- ratios were also analyzed. In CD3+ T cells, a significant reduction was observed in infected Acanthamoeba spp. immunosuppressed mice at 8 dpi and a significant peak was observed at 24 dpi. CD4+ T cells play a key defensive role during the infection of parasites; they fully activate CD8+ T cells by destroying infected cells [52]. They are essential for inflammation responses against Toxoplasma gondii infection and also take part in the generation of anti-parasitic immunity and immune surveillance during concomitant immunity [53]. It has been demonstrated that CD8+ T cells are essential for protective immunity against the malaria exoerythrocytic cycle in the liver and may play a superior role in the immune response in cutaneous leishmaniasis [5456]. In Acanthamoeba spp. infected mice with low immunity we observed an increased CD4+ T cell count at 8 dpi. The subsequent downward trend of CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells during Acanthamoeba spp. infection may be related to the establishment of the adaptive response to acute infection. Moreover, Gangneux et al. [57] observed that the percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the spleen of infected Leishmania infantum mice treated with glucocorticoids did not show statistical differences vs the control group. Immunosuppressive therapy may interfere with the circulation of immune cells, promote apoptosis of lymphoid cells, and induce downregulation of T cells [21]. Moreover, in Acanthamoeba spp. infected immunosuppressed hosts, we observed a statistically significant downregulation and an insignificant upregulation of CD4-/CD8- ratios compared to control at 8 dpi, 16 dpi, and 24 dpi. Acanthamoeba spp. had no significant effect on the CD4+/CD8+ ratio in immunosuppressed mice during infection.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that analysis of the immune response and pathogenesis mechanisms of clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba spp. in an animal model not only has a purely cognitive significance but above all, may help in the development of effective methods of pharmacological therapy. We observed that the Acanthamoeba spp. strain isolated from a patient with AML and with pneumophilic properties affected the blood picture in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed mice and induced a change in spleen weight during the infection. Moreover, analysis of anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by splenocytes stimulated with concanavalin A demonstrated that Acanthamoeba spp. induced a selective Th1, Th2 and Th17 response at later stages of the infection in immunocompetent hosts. In the case of hosts with low immunity Acanthamoeba spp. elicited robust Th1 cell-mediated immunity without the participation of Th17. We observed suppression of CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes and DN T lymphocyte populations at the beginning, and in the case of DP T-cell in the final phase of Acanthamoeba spp. infection in hosts with low immunity. Also, CD4+ T lymphocytes and CD3+/CD4+ and CD3+/CD8+ lymphocyte counts during each stage of acanthamoebiasis were shown to be upregulated. Immunological and immunophenotypic results require further analysis and determination of a broader panel of cytokines including IL-1, IL-2 and IL-6, as well as immunophenotypic studies in immunocompetent hosts.

Abbreviations

A: 

Immunocompetent Acanthamoeba spp.-infected mice

AIDS: 

Acquired immune deficiency syndrome

AK: 

Acanthamoeba keratitis

AM 22: 

Amoebic strain no. 22

AM: 

Arithmetic mean

AML: 

Acute myeloid leukaemia

AS: 

Immunosuppressed Acanthamoeba spp. infected mice

BASO: 

Basophils

C: 

Immunocompetent uninfected control group mice

CA: 

Cutaneous acanthamoebiasis

CD: 

Cluster of differentiation

ConA: 

Concanavalin A

COX: 

Cyclooxygenase-1

COX-2: 

Cyclooxygenase-2

CS: 

Immunosuppressed uninfected control group mice

DN: 

Double-negative T cells

DP: 

Double-positive T cells

dpi: 

Days post-infection

EOS: 

Eosinophils

GAE: 

Granulomatous amebic encephalitis

HCT: 

Hematocrit

HGB: 

Haemoglobin

HIV: 

Human immunodeficiency virus

IFN-γ: 

Interferon gamma

IgD: 

Immunoglobulin D

IgM: 

Immunoglobulin M

IL-1: 

Interleukin 1

IL-10: 

Interleukin 10

IL-12: 

Interleukin 12

IL-17A: 

Interleukin 17A

IL-2: 

Interleukin 2

IL-4: 

Interleukin 4

IL-6: 

Interleukin 6

IL-8: 

Interleukin 8

K-W test: 

Kruskal-Wallis test

LYM: 

Lymphocytes

mAb: 

Monoclonal antibodies

MONO: 

Monocytes

MPS: 

Methylprednisolone sodium succinate

MZ: 

Marginal zone

NEU: 

Neutrophils

NK: 

Natural killer cells

NN: 

Non-nutrient agar

NS: 

Difference non-significant

p: 

Level of significance

PGE2

Prostaglandin E2

PLT: 

Platelets

RBC: 

Red blood cells

RP: 

Red pulp

RPMI: 

Medium Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium

SD: 

Standard deviation

Th1: 

Type 1 T helper

Th17: 

Type 17 T helper

Th2: 

Type 2 T helper

TNF: 

Tumor necrosis factor

Tregs: 

Regulatory T cells

TXB2

Thromboxane B2

WBC: 

White blood cells

WP: 

White pulp

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kama Plichta for assistance in conducting the experiments.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the research project no. WLBiMl-431-04/S/12/2017 by Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

NLA and DKB conceived and designed the research. NLA and DKB performed the experiments. AKW, IWK, KK, PR, KSP, EP and KL performed laboratory work. NLA, DKB and IWK analyzed the data. NLA and DKB contributed to writing the manuscript. BM, BW and DKB provided scientific supervision of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

The study obtained the consent of the Local Ethics Committee in Szczecin and Poznań (No. 29/2015 of 22 June 2015 and 64/2016 of 09 September 2016). All animal experiments were conducted and handled in strict accordance with good animal practice with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/guide-for-the-care-and-use-of-laboratory-animals.pdf).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology and Medical Parasitology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
(2)
Department of Histology and Embryology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
(3)
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
(4)
Department of General Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland

References

  1. Khan NA. Acanthamoeba: biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006;30:564–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Siddiqui R, Emes R, Eisheikha H, Khan N. How do Acanthamoeba invade the central nervous system? Trends Parasitol. 2012;27:185–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Coven SL, Song E, Steward S, Pierson CR, Cope JR, Ali IK, et al. Acanthamoeba granulomatous amoebic encephalitis after pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Pediatr Transplant. 2017;21:e13060.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Evering T, Weiss LM. The immunology of parasite infections in immunocompromised hosts. Parasite Immunol. 2006;28:549–65.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Lanocha N, Kosik-Bogacka D, Maciejewska A, Sawczuk M, Wilk A, Kuźna-Grygiel W. The occurrence Acanthamoeba (free-living amoeba) in environmental and respiratory samples in Poland. Acta Protozool. 2009;48:271–9.Google Scholar
  6. Lorenzo-Morales J, Khan NA, Walochnik J. An update on Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. Parasite. 2015;22:10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Jager BV, Stamm WP. Brain abscesses caused by free-living amoeba probably of the genus Hartmannella in a patient with Hodgkin’s disease. Lancet. 1972;23:1343–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Walochnik J, Scheikl U, Haller-Schober EM. Twenty years of Acanthamoeba diagnostics in Austria. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2015;62:3–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Morrison AO, Morris R, Shannon A, Lauer SR, Guarner J, Kraft CS. Disseminated Acanthamoeba infection presenting with cutaneous lesions in an immunocompromised patient: a case report, review of histomorphologic findings, and potential diagnostic pitfalls. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016;145:266–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Marciano-Cabral F, Cabral G. Acanthamoeba spp. as agents of disease in humans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:273–307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Omaña-Molina M, Vanzzini-Zago V, Hernandez-Martinez D, Gonzalez-Robles A, Salazar-Villatoro L, Ramirez-Flores E, et al. Acanthamoeba genotypes T3 and T4 as causative agents of amoebic keratitis in Mexico. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:873–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Cano A, Mattana A, Woods S, Henriquez FL, Alexander J, Roberts CW. Acanthamoeba activates macrophages predominantly through Toll-like receptor 4-and MyD88-dependent mechanisms to induce interleukin-12 (IL-12) and IL-6. Infect Immun. 2017;85:e01054–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bloch KC, Schuster FL. Inability to make a premortem diagnosis of Acanthamoeba species infection in a patient with fatal granulomatous amebic encephalitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3003–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Benedetto N, Auriault C. Complex network of cytokines activating murine microglial cell activity against Acanthamoeba castellani. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2002;13:351–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dudley R, Alsam S, Khan NA. The role of proteases in the differentiation of Acanthamoeba castellanii. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;286:9–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Łanocha-Arendarczyk N, Baranowska-Bosiacka I, Kot K, Gutowska I, Kolasa-Wołosiuk A, Chlubek D, et al. Expression and activity of COX-1 and COX-2 in Acanthamoeba spp.-infected lungs according to the host immunological status. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:121.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Markowitz SM, Sobieski T, Martinez AJ, Duma RJ. Experimental Acanthamoeba infections in mice pretreated with methylprednisolone or tetracycline. Am J Pathol. 1978;92:733–44.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kosik-Bogacka DI, Baranowska-Bosiacka I, Salamatin R. Hymenolepis diminuta: Effect of infection on ion transport in colon and blood picture of rats. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124:285–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kabat-Koperska J, Kolasa-Wołosiuk A, Wojciuk B, Wojciechowska-Koszko I, Roszkowska P, Krasnodębska-Szponder B, et al. Changes in the immune system of female wistar rats after exposure to immunosuppressive treatment during pregnancy. Scand J Immunol. 2016;83:418–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Rees EP, Sminia T, Dijkstra CD. Structure and development of the lymphoid organs. In: Mohr U, Dungworth DL, Capen CC, Carlton WW, Sundbergand JP, Ward JM, editors. Pathobiology of the Aging Mouse. Washington: ILSI Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  21. Machado JGI, Hoffmann JLI, Krause VLKI, da Silva AVI, Dias-Melicio LAII, Langoni HI. Cell-mediated immune response to Leishmania chagasi experimental infection of BALB/c immunosuppressed mice. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2010;16:131–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jansen PL. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Detection, treatment and prophylaxis in patients with liver cirrhosis. Neth J Med. 1997;51:123–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Schulte-Hostedde AI, Elsasser SC. Spleen mass, body condition, and parasite load in male American mink (Neovison vison). J Mammal. 2011;92:221–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Górnik K, Kuźna-Grygiel W. Histological studies of selected organs of mice experimentally infected with Acanthamoeba spp. Folia Morphol. 2005;64:161–7.Google Scholar
  25. Im K, Kim DS. Acanthamoebiasis in Korea: two new cases with clinical cases review. Yonsei Med J. 1998;39:478–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zamora A, Henderson H, Swiatlo E. Acanthamoeba encephalitis: a case report and review of therapy. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5:68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang WY, Tan MS, Yu JT, Tan L. Role of pro-inflammatory cytokines released from microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3:136.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Gulati K, Guhathakurta S, Joshi J, Rai N, Ray A. Cytokines and their role in health and disease: a brief overview. MOJ Immunol. 2016;4:00121.Google Scholar
  29. Singh RR. IL-4 and many roads to lupus-like autoimmunity. Clin Immunol. 2003;108:73–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mosser DM, Zhang X. Interleukin-10: new perspectives on an old cytokine. Immunol Rev. 2008;226:205–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Anderson CF, Mendez S, Sack DL. Nonhealing infection despite Th1 polarisation produced by a strain of Leishmania major in C57BL/6 mice. J Immunol. 2005;174:2934–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu YQH, Wang L, Zheng H, Feng J, Liu SH, Cao YM. Plasmodium yoelii: distinct CD4 CD25 regulatory T cell responses during the early stages of infection in susceptible and resistant mice. Exp Parasitol. 2007;115:301–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Loevenich K, Ueffing K, Abel S, Hose M, Matuschewski K, Westendorf AM, et al. DC-derived IL-10 modulates pro-inflammatory cytokine production and promotes induction of CD4(+)IL-10(+) regulatory T cells during Plasmodium yoelii infection. Front Immunol. 2017;28:152.Google Scholar
  34. Mattana A, Sanna M, Cano A, Delogu G, Erre G, Roberts CW, et al. Acanthamoeba castellanii genotype T4 stimulates the production of interleukin-10 as well as proinflammatory cytokines in THP-1 cells, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and human monocyte-derived macrophages. Infect Immun. 2016;84:2953–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Suryawanshi A, Cao Z, Sampson JF, Panjwani N. IL-17A-mediated protection against Acanthamoeba keratitis. J Immunol. 2015;194:650–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Cortvrindt C, Speeckaert R, Moerman A, Delanghe JR, Speeckaert MM. The role of interleukin-17A in the pathogenesis of kidney diseases. Pathology. 2017;49:247–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuwabara T, Ishikawa F, Kondo M, Kakiuchi T. The role of IL-17 and related cytokines in inflammatory autoimmune diseases. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:3908061.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Erdmann H, Roßnagel C, Böhme J, Iwakura Y, Jacobs T, Schaible UE, et al. IL-17A promotes macrophage effector mechanisms against Trypanosoma cruzi by trapping parasites in the endolysosomal compartment. Immunobiology. 2013;218:910–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Das S, Khader S. Yin and yang of interleukin-17 in host immunity to infection. F1000Res. 2017;6:741.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. de Oliveira CI, Brodskyn CI. The immunobiology of Leishmania braziliensis infection. Front Immunol. 2012;3:145.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Mezioug D, Touil-Boukoffa C. Interleukin-17A correlates with interleukin-6 production in human cystic echinococcosis: a possible involvement of IL-17A in immunoprotection against Echinococcus granulosus infection. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2012;23:112–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Silva JL, Rezende-Oliveira K, da Silva MV, Gómez-Hernández C, Peghini BC, Silva NM, et al. IL-17-expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in human toxoplasmosis. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:573825.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Silva-Barrios S, Stäger S. Protozoan parasites and type I IFNs. Front Immunol. 2017;8:14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Abdel-Hafeez EH, Ahmad AK, Abdelgelil NH, Abdellatif MZ, Kamal AM, Hassanin KM, et al. Immunopathological assessments of human Blastocystis spp. in experimentally infected immunocompetent and immunosuppressed mice. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:2061–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Lucey DR, Clerici M, Shearer GM. Type 1 and type 2 cytokine dysregulation in human infectious, neoplastic, and inflammatory diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:532–62.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Padilla AM, Bustamante JM, Tarleton RL. CD8+ T cells in Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;21:385–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomson CW, Lee BP, Zhang L. Double-negative regulatory T cells: non-conventional regulators. Immunol Res. 2006;35:163–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Villani FN, Rocha MO, Nunes Mdo C, Antonelli LR, Magalhães LM, dos Santos JS, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi-induced activation of functionally distinct αβ and γδ CD4- CD8- T cells in individuals with polar forms of Chagas disease. Infect Immun. 2010;78:4421–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Vinton C, Klatt NR, Harris LD, Briant JA, Sanders-Beer BE, Herbert R, et al. CD4-like immunological function by CD4- T cells in multiple natural hosts of simian immunodeficiency virus. J Virol. 2011;85:8702–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Liang Q, Jiao Y, Zhang T, Wang R, Li W, Zhang H, et al. Double negative (DN) [CD3+CD4-CD8-] T cells correlate with disease progression during HIV infection. Immunol Invest. 2013;42:431–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Giraldo NA, Bolaños NI, Cuellar A, Guzman F, Uribe AM, Bedoya A, et al. Increased CD4+/CD8+ double-positive T cells in chronic Chagasic patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Engwerda CR, Ng SS, Bunn PT. The regulation of CD4(+) T cell responses during protozoan infections. Front Immunol. 2014;13(5):498.Google Scholar
  53. Sacks DL. Vaccines against tropical parasitic diseases: a persisting answer to a persisting problem. Nat Immunol. 2014;15:403–510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Kumar V, Rakha A, Saroa R, Bagai U. CD4+T cells expansion in P. berghei (NK-65) infected and immunized BALB/C Mice. J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;5:229.Google Scholar
  55. Ferraz R, Cunha CF, Pimentel MIF, Lyra MR, Pereira-Da-Silva T, Schubach AO, et al. CD3(+)CD4(neg)CD8(neg) (double negative) T lymphocytes and NKT cells as the main cytotoxic-related-CD107a(+) cells in lesions of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:219.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Bueno LL, Morais CG, Lacerda MV, Fujiwara RT, Braga EM. Interleukin-17producing T helper cells are increased during natural Plasmodium vivax infection. Acta Trop. 2012;123:53–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Gangneux JP, Chau F, Sulahian A, Derouin F, Garin YJ. Effects of immunosuppressive therapy on murine Leishmania infantum visceral leishmaniasis. Eur Cytokine Netw. 1999;10:557–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement