Open Access

Oxadiazole-2-oxides may have other functional targets, in addition to SjTGR, through which they cause mortality in Schistosoma japonicum

  • Li-Jun Song1, 2,
  • Huan Luo3,
  • Wen-Hua Fan3,
  • Gu-Ping Wang3,
  • Xu-Ren Yin1, 2,
  • Shuang Shen1, 2,
  • Jie Wang1, 2,
  • Yi Jin1, 2,
  • Wei Zhang1, 2,
  • Hong Gao1, 2,
  • Qian Liu1, 2,
  • Wen-Long Wang3,
  • Bainian Feng3Email author and
  • Chuan-Xin Yu1, 2, 4Email author
Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors20169:26

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1301-3

Received: 7 September 2015

Accepted: 8 January 2016

Published: 20 January 2016

Abstract

Background

Schistosomiasis is one of the world’s major public health problems. Besides praziquantel (PZQ), there is currently no other effective treatment against schistosomiasis. The development of new antischistosomal agents to curb the emergence of PZQ resistance should be a high priority. Oxadiazole-2-oxides have been identified as potential antischistosomal reagents, with thioredoxin glutathione reductase (TGR) being one of their molecular targets.

Methods

To develop novel treatment reagents against Schistosoma japonicum, 30 novel oxadiazole-2-oxides were synthesised and their antischistosomal activities on juvenile and adult S. japonicum were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Their inhibitory activities against S. japonicum thioredoxin glutathione reductase (SjTGR) were also analysed.

Results

Most of the oxadiazole-2-oxides showed good juvenile and adult S. japonica killing activities in vitro. However, the antischistosomal effects of these compounds were not positively correlated with either their inhibition of SjTGR, or with nitric oxide (NO) release. Compounds 4a, 4b, 7c, 13, 16 and 20 resulted in 87.7 %, 83.1 %, 87.1 %, 84.6 %, 90.8 % and 69.5 %, respectively, mortality in the adult worms, when used to treat infected mice at schistosomula stage. These mortality rates were similar to or higher than that of artemisinin. Furthermore, compounds 4a and 16 resulted in 66.7 % and 69.4 % reductions in the worm burdens, respectively, when infected mice were treated at the adult worm stage. These treatment effects were similar to PZQ. No differences in activity of the oxadiazole-2-oxides against female and male adult worms were observed. The toxicity of the oxadiazole-2-oxides on mammalian cells appeared to be similar to, or less than, that of PZQ.

Conclusions

The antischistosomal activity of the oxadiazole-2-oxides does not depend on NO production or the inhibition of SjTGR activity. There may be other functional targets of the oxadiazole-2-oxides in S. japonicum. Several of the novel oxadiazole-2-oxides synthesised in this study could be used to develop novel antischistosomal drugs and explore potential molecular targets.

Keywords

Schistosoma japonicum Oxadiazole-2-oxide Antischistosomal activity Structure-activity relationship (SAR)

Background

Schistosomiasis is one of the most prevalent parasitic diseases. It has been estimated that 779 million people are at risk of infection worldwide [1]. The infection is caused by trematodes of the genus Schistosoma, among which Schistosoma mansoni, S. haematobium, S. japonicum, S. mekongi and S. intercalatum represent the most important pathogenic species for human beings. Depending on the species, the worms (schistosomes) persist in the liver and hepatic portal system or the urinary tract system of humans. Mature schistosomes lay eggs within their host, which often get trapped in the host’s tissues, resulting in inflammatory and obstructive diseases of the affected organs [2]. In China, the disease caused by S. japonica is a major public health concern, with more than 280 thousand people infected [3]. To cure subtle morbidity and prevent the development of severe chronic stage hepatosplenomegaly, praziquantel (PZQ) is the only choice of chemotherapy. The drug has been widely used for more than three decades and is therefore susceptible to the emergence of praziquantel-resistant schistosomes [4]. In addition, the mechanism by which PZQ works is still undefined [5].

A number of recent studies have attempted to modify PZQ [612], explore new chemical entities from natural products [13] and identify additional drug targets for the chemotherapy of schistosomiasis [1418]. Oxadiazole-2-oxides were identified as new drug leads against S. mansoni, while thioredoxin glutathione reductase (TGR) was found to be a potential molecular target of the oxadiazole-2-oxides [15, 16]. Previously, we have shown that S. japonicum TGR (SjTGR) plays an essential role in maintaining the redox balance in S. japonicum and confirmed SjTGR as a potential target for the development of new drugs against schistosomiasis [18].

To our knowledge, few data have been reported for oxadiazole-2-oxides against S. japonicum [16]. We designed and synthesised novel oxadiazole-2-oxides to target SjTGR. The results show that some novel oxadiazole-2-oxides had a good killing activity against S. japonicum, but did not inhibit the activity of SjTGR, implying that oxadiazole-2-oxides may have other functional targets in S. japonicum.

Methods

Reagents

5,5’-Dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) and β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 2’-phosphate reduced tetrasodium salt (NADPH) were purchased from Roche (Basel, Switzerland). RPMI 1640 and fetal bovine serum were from Gibco (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, USA). 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and PZQ were sourced from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (Saint Louis, USA). The Nitric Oxide Assay Kit and 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (carboxy-PTIO) came from Beyotime Biotechnology Corporation (Shanghai, China). Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) were purchased from Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and artemisinin (AS) was purchased from Zelang Medical Technology Co. Ltd. (Nanjing, China).

Parasites and experimental animals

Infected Oncomelania hupensis, provided by the Department of Snail Biology, Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, were incubated at 25–28 °C, under illumination, for 2 h to hatch S. japonicum cercariae. The cercariae were collected from the water surface with clean cover glass and placed into a centrifuge tube using pre cooled RPMI 1640. Centrifugation was performed for 1 min at 1500 rpm, and then the steps above were repeated. After centrifugation, the supernatant solution was removed. The cercariae at the bottom were washed twice and resuspended with RPMI 1640. Approximately 20–30 cercariae (1 mL of the resuspension medium) were added to one well in a 24-well culture plate. They were incubated overnight at 37 °C with 5 % CO2. The survival rates and number of tails shed were observed under an inverted microscope. Cercariae that had shed their tails were used as juvenile S. japonicum [19, 20].

ICR mice (20–22 g), were obtained from the Shanghai Sub-Center of Experimental Animals, Chinese Academy of Sciences. They were maintained at the Department of Experimental Animals, Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases. To infect each mouse, its abdominal skin was exposed to 50 S. japonica cercariae. All of the mice were executed to collect S. japonica adult worms, through portal vein perfusion, 35 days post-infection [21]. The adult S. japonica collected were washed with RPMI 1640 medium and then kept in RPMI 1640 medium (pH 7.5) with HEPES 20 mM, penicillin (100 IU/mL), streptomycin (100 mg/mL) and 10 % fetal bovine serum [22]. Then, two pairs of adult worms were transferred into each well of a 24-well culture plate, with 2 mL of the same medium. The worms were cultured at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere with 5 % CO2.

Synthesis of oxadiazole-2-oxide derivatives

Compounds 4a4c, 7a7c and 8 were prepared using a protocol similar to that reported by the Maloney group (Scheme 1) [15]. To make compounds 921 (Scheme 2), compound 8 was coupled with various bromides in the presence of Cs2CO3, with yields of 40–60 %. For compound 22, compound 7b was treated with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) and azodiisobutyronitrile (AIBN) in CCl4, obtaining a yield of 54 %. Then, compound 22 was coupled with various aromatic alcohols, using Cs2CO3 as the base in DMF, to give compounds 2330, the yields of which varied from 25 to 45 %. The procedures for the preparation of compounds are detailed in Additional file 1.
Scheme 1

Synthesis of compounds 4a4c and 7a–7c. Reagents and conditions: (a) EtOH, H2SO4, reflux, overnight; (b) DIBAL-H, DCM, N2, −70 °C to rt, 12 h, 90–95 %; (c) NaNO2, HOAc, H2O, 0 °C to rt, 25–32 %; (d) MnO2, DCM, water–ice to rt, 4 h, 92 %; (e) NH4OH-HCl, pyridine, EtOH, 90 °C, 3 h, 49 %; (f) SOCl2, DMF, N2, 30 °C, 12 h, 70–75 %

Scheme 2

Synthesis of compounds 8–21. Reagents and conditions: (g) DL-methionine, methanesulfonic acid, N2, 70 °C, 2 h, 53 %; (h) bromides, Cs2CO3, DMF, 30–60 °C, 40–60 %

Oxadiazole-2-oxides inhibition of recombinant SjTGR

The purified recombinant SjTGR proteins were produced according to the method described by Song et al. [18]. The inhibition of TrxR activity by the recombinant SjTGR was performed as reported by Rai et al. [15]. Briefly, 50 nM SjTGR and 1 mM NADPH were incubated with different concentrations of oxadiazole-2-oxides (2, 4, 6, 10, 20 μM) for 15 min at room temperature. Then, potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 10 mM EDTA, 100 μM NADPH, and 3 mM DTNB was added to start the reaction. The increase of absorbance at 412 nm was monitored during the first 2 min. All assays were done in triplicate. Assays with no inhibition were performed as the control treatment. The 50 % inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of the oxadiazole-2-oxides were calculated by curve fitting, using SPSS 13.0 statistical software.

Detection of nitric oxide (NO) release

The release of nitric oxide (NO) was measured as previously reported [16]. Briefly, 15 nM SjTGR, with or without 100 μM NADPH or 5 mM cysteine, was incubated at room temperature with 10 μM of the oxadiazole-2-oxides for 50 min. The NO release was detected according to the instructions of the Nitric Oxide Assay Kit, with the absorbance being measured at 540 nm. The NO release of sodium nitrite, as a standard substance, was also measured. The values of NO release were calculated on the basis of the regression line plotted for the NO release from sodium nitrite. Each reaction was done in triplicate and the data presented are the average of three independent experiments.

Healthy S. japonica adult worms were collected as described above and homogenized in 0.1 M potassium phosphate (pH 7.4). The homogenates were centrifuged at 20,000 g for 1 h at 4 °C and the supernatants were assayed for NO release. In addition, the worm homogenates (100 μg) were incubated with 10 μM oxadiazole-2-oxides for 50 min at room temperature and the production of NO was detected as above. Each reaction was done in triplicate.

Cytotoxicity assay of oxadiazole-2-oxides on Hela cells

Cytotoxicity assays were performed using Hela cells. Cells in the exponential growth phase were collected by centrifugation and a concentration of 4–5 × 104/mL was created. 100 μL of the cell suspension was added to each well of a 96-well plate and cultured overnight at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere with 5 % CO2. Oxadiazole-2-oxides (at 10, 20, 40, 80 and 160 μM) were added. Each concentration was assayed in triplicate, and control wells (no cells and no drugs) were assayed at the same time. The “no cell” control wells only contained RPMI 1640 medium, MTT, DMSO, and oxadiazole-2-oxides. The “no drug” control wells contained the Hela cells, RPMI 1640 medium, MTT and DMSO. The cells were cultured for 48 h at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere with 5 % CO2. Then, 20 μL of 5 mg/mL MTT was added to each well and the culture conditions were maintained for 4 h. After this point, the medium was removed and 150 μL DMSO was added into each well to dissolve any crystallisation. The value of absorbance at 570 nm of each well was measured (at 570 nm) with a microplate reader to assess the toxic effect of the oxadiazole-2-oxides on the vertebrate cells.

Toxicity of oxadiazole-2-oxides on juvenile and adult S. japonica in vitro

Oxadiazole-2-oxides (10 μmol) were dissolved in 1 mL DMSO to prepare stock solutions, which were kept cold and in the dark. Working solutions were prepared prior to use at the appropriate dilutions, using RPMI 1640 medium.

20–30 juvenile worms were transferred into each well of a 24-well culture plate, containing 2 mL RPMI 1640 medium, 20 mM HEPES, 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin and 10 % fetal bovine serum. Then, oxadiazole-2-oxides (2, 5, 10, and 50 μM), diluted with the RPMI 1640 medium, were added to their allocated wells. The worms in the negative control wells were treated with equal volumes of RPMI 1640 or DMSO and worms treated with AS were observed as positive controls. The juvenile worms’ survival rates were observed under an inverted phase contrast microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) at 24, 48 and 72 h. Parasite death was defined as an unclear internal structure of the juvenile worms, with incomplete tegument and contents overflowing radially, or unclear internal structure with complete tegument, but having no motor activity during 1 min of continuous observation [23]. All assays were repeated three times.

Adult worms were cultured in a 24-well culture plate for 30–60 min at 37 °C, in a humid atmosphere with 5 % CO2. Then, oxadiazole-2-oxides at different concentrations (10, 25, 50, 100 μM) were added. Equal volumes of RPMI 1640 or DMSO were applied as negative controls, while PZQ was applied as a positive control. The adult worm mobility and parasite survival rates were monitored using an inverted phase contrast microscope, at 24, 48 and 72 h. Parasite death was defined as there being no motor activity during 2 min of continuous observation, and morphological and tegumental alterations [24]. All assays were repeated three times.

To assess the importance of NO production, the potassium salt of carboxy-PTIO, a NO scavenger, was dissolved in water and 100 mM was incubated with freshly perfused adult S. japonica in the presence or absence of 10 mM oxadiazole-2-oxides. The worms’ mobility, tegumental alterations and parasite survival were monitored using an inverted microscope. The experiment was done in triplicate.

Oxadiazole-2-oxides treating S. japonica in vivo

The abdominal skin of each mouse (ICR, female, 22–24 g) was exposed to 20 S. japonica cercariae (as described above). The mice were intraperitoneally injected with 10 mg/kg oxadiazole-2-oxides daily for 5 days, beginning either 7 or 35 days post-infection. Control mice were treated with 10 mg/kg of the carrier medium. All mice were sacrificed 42 days post-infection. The worm burden of each mouse was confirmed by counting the number of worms observed from a portal vein perfusion. The mouse livers were digested overnight with 5 % potassium hydroxyl solution at 37 °C and the eggs in the liver tissue were counted under an inverted phase contrast microscope. The worm and egg reduction rates were calculated using the following formulas [18]:
$$ \mathrm{Worm}\ \mathrm{reduction}\ \mathrm{rate}\ \left(\%\right)=\left(\mathrm{mean}\ \mathrm{number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{adult}\ \mathrm{worms}\ \mathrm{per}\ \mathrm{mouse}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{control}\ \mathrm{group}-\mathrm{mean}\ \mathrm{number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{adult}\ \mathrm{worms}\ \mathrm{per}\ \mathrm{mouse}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{experimental}\ \mathrm{group}\right)/\mathrm{mean}\ \mathrm{number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{adult}\ \mathrm{worms}\ \mathrm{per}\ \mathrm{mouse}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{control}\ \mathrm{group}. $$
$$ \mathrm{Egg}\ \mathrm{reduction}\ \mathrm{rate}\ \left(\%\right)=\left(\mathrm{mean}\ \mathrm{number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{eggs}\ \mathrm{per}\ \mathrm{mouse}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{control}\ \mathrm{group}-\mathrm{mean}\ \mathrm{number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{eggs}\ \mathrm{per}\ \mathrm{mouse}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{experimental}\ \mathrm{group}\right)/\mathrm{mean}\ \mathrm{number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{eggs}\ \mathrm{per}\ \mathrm{mouse}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{control}\ \mathrm{group}. $$

Statistical analysis

All data are given as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The worm and egg burden numbers after treatment with oxadiazole-2-oxides were statistically compared with the control, AS or PZQ groups using two-tailed Student’s t-tests. Differences in NO release from the oxadiazole-2-oxides compared with control were similarly assessed. Cell survival rates after exposure to oxadiazole-2-oxides and PZQ, and worm survival rates after exposure to oxadiazole-2-oxides, with or without carboxy-PTIO, were determined using chi-square tests. SPSS 13.0 was used for the statistical analyses. Differences between mean values were considered to be significant at the level of 5 %.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for the work performed was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB00004221) of Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Wuxi, China (Permit Number: JIPDAERP20131120). All animals were housed in facilities and provided food and water conventionally. The infection, intraperitoneal injections and sacrifices (by carbon dioxide asphyxiation) were carried out according to recommendations in the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Ministry of Science and Technology of People’s Republic of China ([2006]398). Suffering was minimised in accordance with the guidelines.

Results

Syntheses of oxadiazole-2-oxides and their inhibitory activities against SjTGR

Thirty oxadiazole-2-oxides were designed and synthesised following Schemes 1, 2, 3. The structures of these oxadiazole-2-oxides are detailed in Table 1. The recombinant SjTGR was incubated with each oxadiazole-2-oxide, and their respective inhibition on the TrxR activity of SjTGR was observed. The results showed that compounds 4a, 4b, 4c, 7a, 7b, 7c, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 20 and 22 inhibited the activity of SjTGR (Fig. 1 and Table 1), with IC50 values between 0.5 and 37.4 μM. Compounds 9, 10, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29 did not inhibit the activity of SjTGR (Table 1).
Scheme 3

Synthesis of compounds 22–30. Reagents and conditions: (b) NBS, AIBN, CCl4, 80 °C, overnight, 54 %; (c) aromatic alcohols, or Cs2CO3, DMF, 30–60 °C, 25–45 %

Table 1

Structures of the oxadiazole-2-oxides and their inhibitory activities against SjTGR

a SjTGR enzymatic assay

b No activity

Fig. 1

Inhibition of recombinant SjTGR by oxadiazole-2-oxides. 50 nM SjTGR and 1 mM NADPH were incubated with different concentrations of oxadiazole-2-oxides (2, 4, 6, 10, 20 μM) for 15 min at room temperature. Then, potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 10 mM EDTA, 100 μM NADPH, 3 mM DTNB was added to start the reaction. The increase in absorbance at 412 nm was monitored during the first 2 min. All assays were done in triplicate. Results shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3)

NO production of oxadiazole-2-oxides in vitro

When the oxadiazole-2-oxides were incubated with cysteine at room temperature, compounds 7c, 13, 16, 20, and 22 released 9.0 ± 0.5, 8.6 ± 0.4, 8.3 ± 0.0, 8.8 ± 0.7, and 9.0 ± 0.1 μM NO, respectively. The PBS and DMSO control wells produced 3.6 ± 0.4 and 3.2 ± 0.5 μM NO, respectively (Fig. 2). The difference in NO production between the above five compounds and DMSO was significant (P < 0.05). The other oxadiazole-2-oxides produced similar NO levels to the PBS and DMSO control wells (Fig. 2; P > 0.05). Incubation of the oxadiazole-2-oxides with SjTGR + NADPH, SjTGR alone or worm homogenate supernatant, also released similar NO to the PBS and DMSO controls (P > 0.05; Additional file 2: Table S1).
Fig. 2

Nitrogen orxide (NO) release from oxadiazole-2-oxides incubated in vitro. 15 nM SjTGR, 100 μM NADPH and 5 mM cysteine were incubated with 10 μM oxadiazole-2-oxides for 50 min at room temperature. The nitric oxide (NO) released was detected according to the NO Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology Corporation). The NO release levels were calculated based on the regression line of sodium nitrite (standard). Each reaction was done in triplicate. Results shown are the mean ± SD (n = 3)

Cytotoxicity of oxadiazole-2-oxides on Hela cells

The cytotoxicity assessment of the oxadiazole-2-oxides on the Hela cells was observed using the MTT method. The viability of the Hela cells immersed in 80 μM of PZQ for 72 h was 76 %, while those in 80 μM of compounds 4a, 4b, 7c, 13, 16, 20 after 72 h were 91 %, 96 %, 66 %, 80 %, 89 % and 87 % viable, respectively. Except for compound 7c, the toxicity of compounds 13, 4a, 4b, 20, and 16 to the Hela cells was similar to, or less than that of PZQ. The differences in toxicity were not significant, between the oxadiazole-2-oxides and PZQ (P > 0.05).

Toxicity of oxadiazole-2-oxides to cultured juvenile and adult S. japonica

The survival of juvenile and adult S. japonica, cultured in a medium, containing different concentrations of oxadiazole-2-oxides showed that, compared to AS – AS at 50 μM resulted in the death of 51.3 ± 5.1 % juvenile worms after 24 h – compounds 4b, 7c, 9, 22 and 23 at 50 μM increased mortality, to more than 70.0 % after 24 h. In contrast, compounds 4c, 7a, 8, 12, 13, 16, 17, 21 and 28 (at 50 μM) did not affect the juvenile worms, with less than 30.0 % mortality after 24 h. Compared to PZQ, which, at 25 μM resulted in the death of 25.0 ± 7.8 % adult worms after 24 h, compounds 7a, 7b, 7c, 12, 14, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 26 and 28 at 25 μM increased mortality, to more than 75.0 %. Compounds 17 and 29 did not cause death in the adult worms after 24 h, even at the maximum concentration tested (100 μM). Interestingly, we found that compounds 4a, 7c, 13, 16 and 20 displayed killing activities to both the juvenile and adult worms of S. japonica. At concentrations of 50 μM, compounds 7c, 13 and 16 resulted in 100.0 ± 0.0 % mortality of adult worms within 24 h, and 100.0 ± 0.0 %, 41.0 ± 6.3 % and 72.1 ± 3.7 % mortality of juvenile worms after 72 h, respectively. 100 μM of compounds 4a, 20 caused 100.0 ± 0.0 % of the adult worms to die, and 90.0 ± 2.8 % and 67.6 ± 4.5 % of the juvenile worms died in 72 h, respectively. 100 μM of compound 4b resulted in 57.1 ± 2.1 % adult worm death at 24 h, 100.0 ± 0.0 % adult worm mortality after 48 h, and 100.0 ± 0.0 % juvenile mortality at 72 h. The killing activities against the juvenile and adult worms of these 7 compounds increased with concentration and time (Additional file 3: Tables S2 and Additional file 4: Table S3, Fig. 3a, b, c, d). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality due to the sex of the worms, among the seven compounds (Fig. 3e). When a NO scavenger (carboxy-PTIO) was added to the culture of adult worms in vitro, with compounds 7c and 16, there were no differences in the killing activities of the compounds (with or without carboxy-PTIO; P > 0.05) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

Effects of oxadiazole-2-oxides on mortality of juvenile and adult S. japonica in vitro. Oxadiazole-2-oxides were applied at different concentrations and mortality was measured in the juvenile worms after 72 h (a) and adult worms after 24 h (b). In c, the mortality of juvenile S. japonica caused by the oxadiazole-2-oxides (50 μM) at different exposure times is shown. In d the mortality of adult S. japonica caused by the oxadiazole-2-oxides (10 μM) at different exposure times is shown. In e, the mortality of male and female adult specimens of S. japonica exposed to 8 μM of oxadiazole-2-oxides after 120 h is shown

Fig. 4

Activity of oxadiazole-2-oxides against adult S. japonica in vitro, with and without carboxy-PTIO. Carboxy-PTIO was incubated with freshly perfused adult S. japonica at 100 mM in the presence and absence of 10 mM oxadiazole-2-oxides. The worms’ mobility, tegumental alterations and survival rates were monitored under an inverted microscope. The experiment was done in triplicate. The percentage of adult worms that survived are shown (mean ± SD; n = 3)

The treatment effect of oxadiazole-2-oxides in vivo

The results of treating the mice with the oxadiazole-2-oxides in vivo showed that compounds 4a, 4b, 7c, 13, 16 and 20 caused 87.7 %, 83.1 %, 87.1 %, 84.6 %, 90.8 % and 69.5 % mortality in the adult worms, respectively; and the eggs were reduced by 47.0 %, 0 %, 52.0 %, 52.6 %, 49.5 % and 3.3 %, respectively (when the mice were treated at the juvenile worm stage). There was a significant rise in the adult worm reduction rate of compound 16, compared to the AS group (78.5 % in worm burdens, P < 0.05) (Table 2). Compounds 4a and 16 resulted in 66.7 % and 69.4 % reductions in the worms, respectively, and 3.8 % and 20.0 % reduction in the eggs, respectively (when the mice were treated at the adult worm stage). The treatment effect of compounds 4a and 16 were similar to that of PZQ (worm reduction rate was 72.3 %; P > 0.05). The other novel oxadiazole-2-oxides tested appeared to not affect the adult worms (Table 3).
Table 2

Treatment effects of oxadiazole-2-oxides on juvenile S. japonicum in mice

Groups

Mice No.

Number of worms (Mean ± SD)

Worm reduction rate (%)

Number of eggs per gram of liver (Mean ± SD)

Egg reduction rate (%)

Control

7

10.8 ± 0.8

 

8,032.9 ± 2,192.1

 

Compound 4a

4

1.3 ± 0.8 (P > 0.05**)

87.7 (P < 0.01*)

4,258.9 ± 1,910.0 (P > 0.05**)

47.0 (P < 0.05*)

Compound 4b

2

1.8 ± 1.5 (P > 0.05**)

83.1 (P < 0.01*)

8,669.2 ± 2,255.8 (P < 0.05**)

Compound 7c

2

1.4 ± 0.8 (P > 0.05**)

87.1 (P < 0.01*)

3,859.4 ± 3,749.4 (P > 0.05**)

52.0 ( P > 0.05*)

Compound 13

2

1.7 ± 0.7 (P > 0.05**)

84.6 (P < 0.01*)

3,808.9 ± 1,288.9 (P > 0.05**)

52.6 (P < 0.05*)

Compound 16

5

1.0 ± 0.5 (P > 0.05**)

90.8 (P < 0.01*)

4,054.5 ± 1,322.1 (P > 0.05**)

49.5 (P < 0.01*)

Compound 20

6

3.0 ± 0.9 (P < 0.05**)

69.5 (P < 0.01*)

7,767.5 ± 2,676.6 (P < 0.05**)

3.3 (P > 0.05*)

AS

4

2.3 ± 1.0

78.5 (P < 0.01*)

2,932.2 ± 1,149.3

63.5 (P < 0.01*)

*Effect of compound versus control analysed by Student’s t-test; **Effect of compound versus AS analysed by Student’s t-test

Table 3

Treatment effects of oxadiazole-2-oxides on adult S. japonicum in mice

Groups

Mice No.

Number of worms (Mean ± SD)

Worm reduction rate (%)

Number of eggs per gram of liver (Mean ± SD)

Egg reduction rate (%)

Control

7

12.0 ± 2.1

 

8032.9 ± 2192.1

 

Compound 4a

4

4.0 ± 2.5 (P > 0.05**)

66.7 (P < 0.01*)

7730.8 ± 1457.8 (P < 0.05**)

3.8 (P > 0.05*)

Compound 4b

4

9.0 ± 3.8 (P < 0.05**)

25.0 (P > 0.05*)

7007.8 ± 2420.2 (P < 0.05**)

12.8 (P > 0.05*)

Compound 7c

6

12.0 ± 3.9 (P < 0.05**)

7213.0 ± 2658.0 (P < 0.05**)

10.2 (P > 0.05*)

Compound 13

5

8.6 ± 2.4 (P < 0.05**)

28.3 (P < 0.05*)

8201.4 ± 2066.0 (P < 0.05**)

Compound 16

5

3.7 ± 1.4 (P > 0.05**)

69.4 (P < 0.01*)

6424.1 ± 1193.4 (P < 0.05**)

20.0 (P > 0.05*)

Compound 20

6

4.7 ± 1.1 (P > 0.05**)

61.1 (P < 0.01*)

10094.7 ± 1691.0 (P < 0.05**)

PZQ

6

3.3 ± 1.7

72.3 (P < 0.01*)

3721.5 ± 1600.6

53.7 (P < 0.01*)

* Effect of compound versus control analysed by Student’s t-test; **Effect of compound versus PZQ analysed by Student’s t-test

Discussion

For almost three decades, PZQ has been the only drug recommended by the World Health Organization to treat and control schistosomiasis, through mass drug administration (MDA) programs [25]. No vaccine has ever been developed [25]. PZQ does not guard against reinfection and is not effective against juvenile schistosomes. Furthermore, schistosome phenotypes are emerging that are resistant to PZQ chemotherapy, and PZQ has a limited effect on developed liver and spleen lesions [4, 26]. Although these issues have not led to treatment failures or the necessity to change control measures to date, it is imperative to develop new antischisosomal agents in anticipation of the potential threat.

Oxadiazole-2-oxides have been identified to inhibit the activity of TGR and kill S. mansoni worms during the in vivo treatment of schistosome-infected mice, which led to more than 90 % reduction in the worm burdens [15, 16]. However, there has been little attention on the effect of the oxadiazole-2-oxides against S. japonica, a helminth endemic to Asia. We designed and synthesised 30 oxadiazole-2-oxides, on the basis of Schemes 1, 2, 3, and studied their killing activities against juvenile and adult S. japonica. The mechanisms of action of the oxadiazole-2-oxides were also explored.

The in vitro antischistosomal activity on juvenile and adult S. japonica, as well as their inhibitory activity against SjTGR (assessed using our previously reported protocol [18]) showed (Table 1 and Additional file 3: Tables S2 and Additional file 4: Table S3) that compounds 7a–c and 8 had the same structures as those described in the work with S. mansoni [15]. These compounds had good worm killing activity, resulting in 100.0 ± 0.0 %, 83.3 ± 4.7 %, 70.0 ± 7.1 %, and 71.4 ± 0.9 % mortality in the adult worms after 72 h, at concentrations of 10 μM, respectively; these mortality levels are similar to the data (100.0 %, 70.0 %, 100.0 %, and 100.0 %, respectively) obtained using S. mansoni [15]. These data show that the oxadiazole-2-oxides may have the same pharmacology in both schistosome species.

Comparing compounds 4a–4c and 7a–7c, the cyano group in compound 7c replaced the hydroxyl group in compound 4c, and at 100 μM, compound 4c caused 57.1 ± 2.3 % mortality while compound 7c caused 100.0 ± 0.0 % mortality in the adult worms. When the hydroxyl group in compound 4a was changed into cyano group of compound 7a, the activity against SjTGR slightly weakened (the IC50 values were 2.7 μM and 12.2 μM, respectively), but the worm killing activity of 7a was markedly enhanced. In contrast, compound 4b had both better activity against SjTGR and better worm killing activity, than 7b. In compounds 911 the number of CH2 groups between the O atom and ester group increased, the corresponding SjTGR inhibitory effects increased, but the worm killing activity did not. Interestingly, compound 9, which had no SjTGR inhibitory activity, caused the best worm mortality of the three compounds. Among compounds 1216, compounds 12, 13 and 14 caused moderate SjTGR inhibition and had good worm killing activities. Compound 15 did not inhibit SjTGR and exhibited similar worm killing activity at 10 μM to compounds 12, 13 and 14. Changing the C–C single bond (compound 15) into a double bond (C = C; compound 16), inhibited SjTGR at sub-micromolar concentrations (IC50 = 0.54 μM), but there was no change in activity against the parasite.

As for compounds 1721, compound 18, with an isopentyloxy group, did not inhibit SjTGR, while compound 20 with a prop-2-yn-1-yloxy group inhibited SjTGR at low micromolar concentrations; these two compounds both killed 100.0 ± 0.0 % of worms in 72 h, at concentrations of 25 μM. The symmetrical compound 21 did not inhibit SjTGR and exhibited slightly poorer worm killing activity than compound 13. Interestingly, compound 19, with a benzyloxy group, was the best at killing worms among all the compounds assessed. However, with a carbonyl group inserted between the phenyl group and carbon atom, compound 17 was poor at killing worms.

Among compounds 2229, those with bulkier aromatic groups (compounds 27, 28 and 29) caused low mortality rates, compared with compound 19, which had a smaller phenyl group. In addition, compounds without substitution on the phenyl group (compounds 19 and 23) were better at killing the worms than those with substitution (compounds 24, 25 and 26). Except for compounds 25 and 29, the other oxadiazole-2-oxides caused higher worm mortality rates than PZQ. Compound 22 moderately inhibited SjTGR, and had a good worm killing activity; this indicates the worm killing activities of the oxadiazole-2-oxides were not directly correlated to their SjTGR inhibitory activities.

The results of the mice experiments showed large and highly significant reductions in worm burdens by treating the mice at juvenile worm stage with compounds 4a, 4b, 7c, 13 and 16, compared to AS. The treatment effects of compounds 4a and 16 were almost the same as PZQ, at the adult worm stage. These results generally agree with Rai et al. [15], who reported that oxadiazole-2-oxide derivatives nearly cured S. mansoni-infected mice, with a 90 % reduction in the worm burdens. However, there was a contradiction between the worm and egg reduction rates in the PZQ and oxadiazole-2-oxides treatments for the mice; compounds 4a and 16 seemed to eliminate the adult parasites essentially to the same extent as PZQ, but had less effect on the egg burden than PZQ. The main reason was that the reductions in the female worms due to treatment with compounds 4a and 16 were 36.8 % and 44.7 %, which was less than the reduction in female worms due to PZQ treatment (60.5 %) (data not shown). This structure activity relationship (SAR) could have important implications for further drug development of the oxadiazole-2-oxides against schistosomiasis.

The oxadiazole-2-oxide core is a class of NO donating compounds [27]. NO is a free radical and is a well-studied physiological signaling agent; it is best known for its ability to relax smooth muscle tissue, resulting in vasodilatation and increased blood flow at low concentrations [28]. However, elevated levels of NO can be toxic, which can kill normal cells, tumuor cells, bacteria and parasites [2931]. Rai et al. [15] proposed that oxadiazole-2-oxides kill S. mansoni due to the free thiols of TGR, which can attack the oxadiazole-oxide, affecting its molecular arrangement and releasing of NO; they supposed that the concomitant inhibition of TGR activity would result in the accumulation of reactive oxygen species and increase oxidative stress. However, our NO release and scavenger experiment showed that when compounds 7c, 13, 16, 20 and 22, and furoxan with a cyano group, were incubated with cysteine, the release of NO increased. When the cyano group of compounds 4a and 4b were replaced with a hydroxyl group, no NO release was observed. These results show that the release of NO was related to the cyano group. However compounds 21, 23 and 26 had a cyano group, but did not release NO. Compared with the structure of compounds 7c, 13, 16, 20 and 22, this may be related to the hydrogen, which was replaced by a benzene ring, influencing the spatial structure of the compounds. Therefore, the release of NO may be relevant to the position of the cyano group in the compound. Compounds 4a, 4b, 7c, 13, 16, 20 and 22 released NO and the values of their activity against SjTGR were all under 10 μM. Compounds 19, 21 and 26 did not release NO and neither did they inhibit the SjTGR activity. It appears that the release of NO may inhibit the activity of SjTGR. However, compounds 4a and 4b did not release NO, but did strongly inhibit SjTGR, with IC50 values of 2.7 and 1.7 μM. These results indicate that oxadiazole-2-oxides have other mechanisms against SjTGR activity.

In addition, when the oxadiazole-2-oxides were incubated with SjTGR or worm homogenate for 50 min at room temperature, no NO release was observed. This illustrates that the relationship between SjTGR inhibition and the release of NO by oxadiazole-2-oxides needs further investigation. Even though compounds 23 and 26 did not release NO they had good activity against the worms in vitro; the NO clear experiment showed that there was no difference in the killing activity of the oxiadiazole-2-oxides against the worms in vitro, with or without carboxy-PTIO. This shows that the effects of the drugs against the worms were not correlated with the NO release from the oxiadiazole-2-oxides, indicating that there are other mechanisms, besides NO, that led to mortality of the parasites. That is, the oxadiazole-2-oxides synthesised in this study may have another target, in addition to SjTGR, through which they kill S. japonica.

Our study shows that there were no obvious correlations among the activity of oxadiazole-2-oxides against S. japonicum worms, SjTGR inhibition and the production of NO. One reason for this could be as suggested by Rai et al. [15]; worm death may not occur until the GSH/GSSG ratio reaches a critical point and the overall worm redox balance is unrecoverable, making it difficult to derive correlations between mortality in the worms and TGR inhibition below a certain level. In addition, Treger et al. [32] reported that oxadiazole-2-oxides kill Ancylostoma ceylanicum and proved that their target was not glutathione reductase. Besides these reasons, several studies [3336] have shown that oxadiazole-2-oxides have many functions, which have been used in new drug developments against bacteria, fungi, viruses, worms, tumors, syncopes and immune suppressors. This indicates that oxadiazole-2-oxides may have a lot of function targets. Our study has shown that oxadiazole-2-oxides may have other targets and mechanisms, in addition to SjTGR and its inhibition, within S. japonicum.

Conclusions

In this study, a series of novel oxadiazole-2-oxides were designed and synthetised. Some of them killed juvenile and adult S. japonica effectively. The antischistosomal activity of these compounds was related to their structure, but not positively correlated to the inhibition of SjTGR or NO release. These oxadiazole-2-oxides may serve as the leads to develop novel antischistsosomal drugs and explore potential molecular targets further.

Abbreviations

TGR: 

thioredoxin glutathione reductase

SjTGR: 

S. japonicum thioredoxin glutathione reductase

DTNB: 

5, 5’-Dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)

NADPH: 

β-Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 2'-phosphate reduced tetrasodium salt

MTT: 

3-(4, 5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2, 5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide

DMSO: 

dimethyl sulphoxide

AS: 

artemisinin

PZQ: 

praziquantel

carboxy; PTIO: 

Nitric Oxide Assay Kit and 2 - (4 - carboxyphenyl) - 4, 4, 5, 5 - tetramethylimidazoline −1- oxyl – 3 - oxide

EDTA: 

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

HEPES: 

2-[4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl] ethanesulfonic acid

NO: 

nitric oxide

SD: 

standard deviation

SAR: 

structure-activity relationship

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 30972581, 8120316), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (Nos. BK2012544, BK20151120), the Laboratory Research of Parasitic Disease Prevention and Control Platform (No. wk014-002), and Jiangsu Science and Technology Department (No. BM2015024).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory on Technology for Disease Prevention and Control, Ministry of Health, Jiangsu Provincial Key laboratory of Parasite Molecular Biology, Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases
(2)
Public Health Research Center, Jiangnan University
(3)
School of Pharmaceutical Science, Jiangnan University
(4)
Medical College, Jiangnan University

References

  1. Danso-Appiah A, Olliaro PL, Donegan S, Sinclair D, Utzinger J. Drugs for treating Schistosoma mansoni infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2:CD000528.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gryseels B, Polman K, Clerinx J, Kestens L. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet. 2006;368:1106–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zheng H, Zhang LJ, Zhu R, Xu J, Li SZ, Guo JG, et al. Schistosomiasis situation in People’s Republic of China in 2011. Chin J Schisto Control. 2012;24:621–6.Google Scholar
  4. Wang W, Wang L, Liang YS. Susceptibility or resistance of praziquantel in human schistosomiasis: a review. Parasitol Res. 2012;111:1871–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Domling A, Khoury K. Praziquantel and schistosomiasis. Chemmedchem. 2010;5:1420–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Patra M, Ingram K, Pierroz V, Ferrari S, Spingler B, Keiser J, et al. Ferrocenyl derivatives of the anthelmintic praziquantel: design, synthesis, and biological evaluation. J Med Chem. 2012;55:8790–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong YX, Chollet J, Vargas M, Mansour NR, Bickle Q, Alnouti Y, et al. Praziquantel analogs with activity against juvenile Schistosoma mansoni. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20:2481–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Patra M, Ingram K, Pierroz V, Ferrari S, Spingler B, Gasser RB, et al. (η(6)-Praziquantel)Cr(CO)3] derivatives with remarkable in vitro anti-schistosomal activity. Chemistry. 2013;19:2232–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ronketti F, Ramana AV, Chao-Ming X, Pica-Mattoccia L, Cioli D, Todd MH. Praziquantel derivatives I: Modification of the aromatic ring. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:4154–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Duan WW, Qiu SJ, Zhao Y, Sun H, Qiao C, Xia CM. Praziquantel derivatives exhibit activity against both juvenile and adult Schistosoma japonicum. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22:1587–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang ZX, Chen JL, Qiao C. Praziquantel derivatives with antischistosomal activity: aromatic ring modification. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013;82:216–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sadhu PS, Kumar SN, Chandrasekharam M, Pica-Mattoccia L, Cioli D, Rao VJ. Synthesis of new praziquantel derivatives: potential candidates for the treatment of schistosomiasis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22:1103–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ndjonka D, Rapado LN, Silber AM, Liebau E, Wrenger C. Natural products as a source for treating neglected parasitic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:3395–439.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu J, Dyer DH, Cheng J, Wang J, Wang S, Yang Z, et al. Aldose reductase from Schistosoma japonicum: crystallization and structure-based inhibitor screening for discovering antischistosomal lead compounds. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:162.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rai G, Sayed AA, Lea WA, Luecke HF, Chakrapani H, Prast-Nielsen S, et al. Structure mechanism insights and the role of nitric oxide donation guide the development of oxadiazole-2-oxides as therapeutic agents against schistosomiasis. J Med Chem. 2009;52:6474–83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sayed AA, Simeonov A, Thomas CJ, Inglese J, Austin CP, Williams DL. Identification of oxadiazoles as new drug leads for the control of schistosomiasis. Nat Med. 2008;14:407–12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu J, Dyer D, Wang J, Wang S, Du X, Xu B, et al. 3-oxoacyl-ACP reductase from Schistosoma japonicum: integrated in silico-in vitro strategy for discovering antischistosomal lead compounds. Plos One. 2013;8:e64984.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Song LJ, Li JH, Xie SY, Qian CY, Wang J, Zhang W, et al. Thioredoxin Glutathione Reductase as a Novel Drug Target: Evidence from Schistosoma japonicum. Plos One. 2012;7:e31456.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrop R, Wilson RA. Protein synthesis and release by cultured schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 1993;107:265–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Keiser J. In vitro and in vivo trematode models for chemotherapeutic studies. Parasitology. 2010;137:589–603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yolles TK, Moore DV, De Giusti DL, Ripsom CA, Meleney HE. A technique for the perfusion of laboratory animals for the recovery of schistosomes. J Parasitol. 1947;33:419–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Magalhães LG, Kapadia GJ, da Silva Tonuci LR, Ixeta SC, Parreira NA, et al. In vitro schistosomicidal effects of some phloroglucinol derivatives from Dryopteris species against Schistosoma mansoni adult worms. Parasitol Res. 2010;106:395–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Manneck T, Haggenmüller Y, Keiser J. Morphological effects and tegumental alterations induced by mefloquine on schistosomula and adult flukes of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 2010;137:85–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Xiao SH, Mei JY, Jiao PY. The in vitro effect of mefloquine and praziquantel against juvenile and adult Schistosoma japonicum. Parasitol Res. 2009;106:237–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Caffrey CR, Secor WE. Schistosomiasis: From drug deployment to drug development. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:410–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Stelma FF, Talla I, Sow S, Kongs A, Niang M, Polman K, et al. Efficacy and side effects of praziquantel in an epidemic focus of Schistosoma mansoni. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;53:167–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gasco A, Fruttero R, Sorba G, Di Stilo A, Calvino R. NO donors: Focus on furoxan derivatives. Pure Appl Chem. 2004;76:973–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ignarro LJ. Nitric Oxide Biology and Pathobiology. San Diego: Academic; 2000.Google Scholar
  29. Brunet LR. Nitric oxide in parasitic infections. Int Immunopharmacol. 2001;1:1457–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Colasanti M, Gradoni L, Mattu M, Persichini T, Salvati L, Venturini G, et al. Molecular basis for the anti-parasitic effect on NO. Int J Mol Med. 2002;9:131–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rivero A. Nitric oxide: an antiparasitic molecule of invertebrates. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22:219–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Treger RS, Cook AG, Rai G, Maloney DJ, Simeonov A, Jadhav A, et al. Oxadiazole 2-oxides are toxic to the human hookworm, Ancylostoma ceylanicum, however glutathione reductase is not the primary target. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2012;2:171–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Medana C, Ermondi G, Fruttero R, Di Stilo A, Ferretti C, Gasco A. Furoxans as nitric oxide donors. 4-phenyl-3-furoxancarbonitrile: thiol-mediated nitric oxide release and biological evaluation. J Med Chem. 1994;37:4412–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Buonsanti MF, Bertinaria M, Di Stilo A, Cena C, Fruttero R, Gasco A. Nitric oxide donor β2-agonists: furoxan derivatives containing the fenoterol moiety and related furazans. J Med Chem. 2007;50:5003–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Turnbull CM, Cena C, Fruttero R, Gasco A, Rossi AG, Megson IL. Mechanism of action of novel NO-releasing furoxan derivatives of aspirin in human platelets. British J Pharm. 2006;148:517–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sorba G, Galli U, Cena C, Fruttero R, Gasco A, Morini G, et al. A new furoxan NO-donor rabeprazole derivative and related compounds. ChemBioChem. 2003;4:899–903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Song et al. 2016

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement